Orthodox Church Fathers: Patristic Christian Theology Classics Search Engine
On the Incarnation of the Word
Whereas in
what precedes we hav drawn out—choosing a few points from among many—a
sufficient account of the error of the heathen concerning idols, and of the
worship of idols, and how they originally came to be invented; how, namely, out
of wickedness men devised for themselves the worshipping of idols: and whereas
we have by God’s grace noted somewhat also of the divinity of the Word of the
Father, and of His universal Providence and power, and that the Good Father
through Him orders all things, and all things are moved by Him, and in Him are
quickened: come now, Macarius1 (worthy
of that name), and true lover of Christ, let us follow up the faith of our
religion2 , and set forth also what relates to the
Word’s becoming Man, and to His divine Appearing amongst us, which Jews traduce
and Greeks laugh to scorn, but we worship; in order that, all the more for the
seeming low estate of the Word, your piety toward Him may be increased and
multiplied. 2. For the more He is mocked among the unbelieving, the more
witness does He give of His own Godhead; inasmuch as He not only Himself
demonstrates as possible what then mistake, thinking impossible, but what men
deride as unseemly, this by His own goodness He clothes with seemliness, and
what men, in their conceit of wisdom, laugh at as merely human, He by His own
power demonstrates to be divine, subduing the pretensions of idols by His
supposed humiliation—by the Cross—and those who mock and disbelieve invisibly winning
over to recognise His divinity and power. 3. But to treat this subject it is
necessary to recall what has been previously said; in order that you may
neither fail to know the cause of the bodily appearing of the Word of the
Father, so high and so great, nor think it a consequence of His own nature that
the Saviour has worn a body; but that being incorporeal by nature, and Word
from the beginning, He has yet of the loving-kindness and goodness of His own
Father been manifested to us in a human body for our salvation. 4. It is, then,
proper for us to begin the treatment of this subject by speaking of the
creation of the universe, and of God its Artificer, that so it may be duly
perceived that the renewal of creation has been the work of the self-same Word
that made it at the beginning. For it will appear not inconsonant for the
Father to have wrought its salvation in Him by Whose means He made it.
Of the making of the universe and the creation of all
things many have taken different views, and each man has laid down the law just
as he pleased. For some say that all things have come into being of themselves,
and in a chance fashion; as, for example, the Epicureans, who tell us in their self-contempt,
that universal providence does not exist speaking right in the face of obvious
fact and experience. 2. For if, as they say, everything has had its beginning
of itself, and independently of purpose, it would follow that everything had
come into3 mere being, so as to be alike and not
distinct. For it would follow in virtue of the unity of body that everything
must be sun or moon, and in the case of men it would follow that the whole must
be hand, or eye, or foot. But as it is this is not so. On the contrary, we see
a distinction of sun, moon, and earth; and again, in the case of human bodies,
of foot, hand, and head. Now, such separate arrangement as this tells us not of
their having come into being of themselves, but shews that a cause preceded
them; from which cause it is possible to apprehend God also as the Maker and
Orderer of all.
3. But others, including Plato, who is in such repute among the Greeks, argue that God has made the world out of matter previously existing and without beginning. For God could have made nothing had not the material existed already; just as the wood must exist ready at hand for the carpenter, to enable him to work at all. 4. But in so saying they know not that they are investing God with weakness. For if He is not Himself the cause of the material, but makes things only of previously existing material, He proves to be weak, because unable to produce anything He makes without the material; just as it is without doubt a weakness of the carpenter not to be able to make anything required without his timber. For, ex hypothesi, had not the material existed, God would not have made anything. And how could He in that case be called Maker and Artificer, if He owes His ability to make to some other source—namely, to the material? So that if this be so, God will be on their theory a Mechanic only, and not a Creator out of nothing4 ; if, that is, He works at existing material, but is not Himself the cause of the material. For He could not in any sense be called Creator unless He is Creator of the material of which the things created have in their turn been made. 5. But the sectaries imagine to themselves a different artificer of all things, other than the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, in deep blindness even as to the words they use. 6. For whereas the Lord says to the Jews5 : “Have ye not read that from the beginning He which created them made them male and female, and said, For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and they twain shall become one flesh?” and then, referring to the Creator, says, “What, therefore, God hath joined together let not man put asunder:” how come these men to assert that the creation is independent of the Father? Or if, in the words of John, who says, making no exception, “All things6 were made by Him,” and “without Him was not anything made,” how could the artificer be another, distinct from the Father of Christ?
Thus do they vainly speculate. But the godly teaching and
the faith according to Christ brands their foolish language as godlessness. For
it knows that it was not spontaneously, because forethought is not absent; nor
of existing matter, because God is not weak; but that out of nothing, and
without its having any previous existence, God made the universe to exist
through His word, as He says firstly through Moses: “In7
the beginning God created the heaven and the earth;” secondly, in the most
edifying book of the Shepherd, “First8
of all believe that God is one, which created and framed all things, and made
them to exist out of nothing.” 2. To which also Paul refers when he says, “By9 faith we understand that the worlds have
been framed by the Word of God, so that what is seen hath not been made out of
things which do appear.” 3. For God is good, or rather is essentially the
source of goodness: nor10
could one that is good be niggardly of anything: whence, grudging existence to
none, He has made all things out of nothing by His own Word, Jesus Christ our
Lord. And among these, having taken especial pity, above all things on earth,
upon the race of men, and having perceived its inability, by virtue of the
condition of its origin, to continue in one stay, He gave them a further gift,
and He did not barely create man, as He did all the irrational creatures on the
earth, but made them after His own image, giving them a portion even of the
power of His own Word; so that having as it were a kind of reflexion of the
Word, and being made rational, they might be able to abide ever in blessedness,
living the true life which belongs to the saints in paradise. 4. But knowing
once more how the will of man could sway to either side, in anticipation He
secured the grace given them by a law and by the spot where He placed them. For
He brought them into His own garden, and gave them a law: so that, if they kept
the grace and remained good, they might still keep the life in paradise without
sorrow or pain or care besides having the promise of incorruption in heaven;
but that if they transgressed and turned back, and became evil, they might know
that they were incurring that corruption in death which was theirs by nature:
no longer to live in paradise, but cast out of it from that time forth to die
and to abide in death and in corruption. 5. Now this is that of which Holy Writ
also gives warning, saying in the Person of God: “Of every tree11 that is in the garden, eating thou
shalt eat: but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, ye shall not eat
of it, but on the day that ye eat, dying ye shall die.” But by “dying ye shall
die,” what else could be meant than not dying merely, but also abiding ever in
the corruption of death?
You are wondering, perhaps, for what possible reason,
having proposed to speak of the Incarnation of the Word, we are at present
treating of the origin of mankind. But this, too, properly belongs to the aim
of our treatise.
2. For in speaking of the appearance of the Saviour amongst us, we must needs speak also of the origin of men, that you may know that the reason of His coming down was because of us, and that our transgression12 called forth the loving-kindness of the Word, that the Lord should both make haste to help us and appear among men. 3. For of His becoming Incarnate we were the object, and for our salvation He dealt so lovingly as to appear and be born even in a human body. 4. Thus, then, God has made man, and willed that he should abide in incorruption; but men, having despised and rejected the contemplation of God, and devised and contrived evil for themselves (as was said13 in the former treatise), received the condemnation of death with which they had been threatened; and from thenceforth no longer remained as they were made, but14 were being corrupted according to their devices; and death had the mastery over them as king15 . For transgression of the commandment was turning them back to their natural state, so that just as they have had their being out of nothing, so also, as might be expected, they might look for corruption into nothing in the course of time.
5. For if, out of a former normal state of nonexistence, they were called into being by the Presence and loving-kindness of the Word, it followed naturally that when men were bereft of the knowledge of God and were turned back to what was not (for what is evil is not, but what is good is), they should, since they derive their being from God who IS, be everlastingly bereft even of being; in other words, that they should be disintegrated and abide in death and corruption. 6. For man is by nature mortal, inasmuch as he is made out of what is not; but by reason of his likeness to Him that is (and if he still preserved this likeness by keeping Him in his knowledge) he would stay his natural corruption, and remain incorrupt; as Wisdom16 says: “The taking heed to His laws is the assurance of immortality;” but being incorrupt, he would live henceforth as God, to which I suppose the divine Scripture refers, when it says: “I have17 said ye are gods, and ye are all sons of the most Highest; but ye die like men, nothing; but He gave us freely, by the Grace of the Word, a life in correspondence with God. But men, having rejected things eternal, and, by counsel of the devil, turned to the things of corruption, became the cause18 of their own corruption in death, being, as I said before, by nature corruptible, but destined, by the grace following from partaking of the Word, to have escaped their natural state, had they remained good. 2. For because of the Word dwelling with them, even their natural corruption did not come near them, as Wisdom also says19 : “God made man for incorruption, and as an image of His own eternity; but by envy of the devil death came into the world.” But when this was come to pass, men began to die, while corruption thence-forward prevailed against them, gaining even more than its natural power over the whole race, inasmuch as it had, owing to the transgression of the commandment, the threat of the Deity as a further advantage against them.
3. For even in their misdeeds men had not stopped
short at any set limits ; but gradually pressing forward, have passed on beyond
all measure: having to begin with been inventors of wickedness and called down
upon themselves death and corruption; while later on, having turned aside to
wrong and exceeding all lawlessness, and stopping at no one evil but devising
all manner of new evils in succession, they have become insatiable in sinning.
4. For there were adulteries everywhere and thefts, and the whole earth was
full of murders and plunderings. And as to corruption and wrong, no heed was
paid to law, but all crimes were being practised everywhere, both individually
and jointly. Cities were at war with cities, and nations were rising up against
nations; and the whole earth was rent with civil commotions and battles; each
man vying with his fellows in lawless deeds. 8. Nor were even crimes against
nature far from them, but, as the Apostle and witness of Christ says: “For
their20 women changed the
natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men,
leaving the natural use of the women, burned in their lust one toward another,
men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense
of their error which was meet.”
For this cause, then, death having gained upon men, and
corruption abiding upon them, the race of man was perishing; the rational man
made in God’s image was disappearing, and the handiwork of God was in process
of dissolution. 2. For death, as I said above, gained from that time forth a
legal21 hold over us, and
it was impossible to evade the law, since it had been laid down by God because22 of the transgression, and the
result was in truth at once monstrous and unseemly. 3. For it were monstrous,
firstly, that God, having spoken, should prove false— that, when once He had
ordained that man, if he transgressed the commandment, should die the death,
after the transgression man should not die, but God’s word should be broken.
For God would not be true, if, when He had said we should die, man died not. 4.
Again, it were unseemly that creatures once made rational, and having partaken
of the Word, should go to ruin, and turn again toward non-existence by the way
of corruption23 .
5. For it were not worthy of God’s goodness that the things He had made should
waste away, because of the deceit practised on men by the devil. 6. Especially
it was unseemly to the last degree that God’s handicraft among men should be
done away, either because of their own carelessness, or because of the deceitfulness
of evil spirits.
7. So, as the rational creatures were wasting and such works in course of ruin, what was God in His goodness to do? Suffer corruption to prevail against them and death to hold them fast? And where were the profit of their having been made, to begin with? For better were they not made, than once made, left to neglect and ruin. 8. For neglect reveals weakness, and not goodness on God’s part—if, that is, He allows His own work to be ruined when once He had made it—more so than if He had never made man at all. 9. For if He had not made them, none could impute weakness; but once He had made them, and created them out of nothing, it were most monstrous for the work to be ruined, and that before the eyes of the Maker. 10. It was, then, out of the question to leave men to the current of corruption; because this would be unseemly, and unworthy of God’s goodness.
But just as this consequence must needs hold, so, too, on
the other side the just claims24
of God lie against it: that God should appear true to the law He had laid down
concerning death. For it were monstrous for God, the Father of truth, to appear
a liar for our profit and preservation. 2. So here, once more, what possible
course was God to take? To demand repentance of men for their transgression?
For this one might pronounce worthy of God; as though, just as from
transgression men have become set towards corruption, so from repentance they
may once more be set in the way of incorruption. 3. But repentance would,
firstly, fail to guard the just claim25
of God. For He would still be none the more true, if men did not remain in the
grasp of death; nor, secondly, does repentance call men back from what is their
nature—it merely stays them from acts of sin. 4. Now, if there were merely a
misdemeanour in question, and not a consequent corruption, repentance were well
enough. But if, when transgression had once gained a start, men became involved
in that corruption which was their nature, and were deprived of the grace which
they had, being in the image of God, what further step was needed? or what was required
for such grace and such recall, but the Word of God, which had also at the
beginning made everything out of nought?
5. For His it was once more both to bring the corruptible to incorruption, and to maintain intact the just claim26 of the Father upon all. For being Word of the Father, and above all, He alone of natural fitness was both able to recreate everything, and worthy to suffer on behalf of all and to be ambassador for all with the Father.
For this purpose, then, the incorporeal and incorruptible
and immaterial Word of God comes to our realm, howbeit he was not far from us27 before. For no part of Creation is
left void of Him: He has filled all things everywhere, remaining present with
His own Father. But He comes in condescension to shew loving-kindness upon us,
and to visit us. 2. And seeing the race of rational creatures in the way to
perish, and death reigning over them by corruption; seeing, too, that the
threat against transgression gave a firm hold to the corruption which was upon
us, and that it was monstrous that28
before the law was fulfilled it should fall through: seeing, once more, the
unseemliness of what was come to pass: that the things whereof He Himself was
Artificer were passing away: seeing, further, the exceeding wickedness of men,
and how by little and little they had increased it to an intolerable pitch
against themselves: and seeing, lastly, how all men were under penalty of
death: He took pity on our race, and had mercy on our infirmity, and
condescended to our corruption, and, unable to bear that death should have the
mastery—lest the creature should perish, and His Father’s handiwork in men be
spent for nought—He takes unto Himself a body, and that of no different sort
from ours. 3. For He did not simply will to become embodied, or will merely to
appear29 . For if He willed
merely to appear, He was able to effect His divine appearance by some other and
higher means as well. But He takes a body of our kind, and not merely so, but
from a spotless and stainless virgin, knowing not a man, a body clean and in
very truth pure from intercourse of men. For being Himself mighty, and
Artificer of everything, He prepares the body in the Virgin as a temple unto
Himself, and makes it His very own30
as an instrument, in it manifested, and in it dwelling. 4. And thus taking from
our bodies one of like nature, because all were under penalty of the corruption
of death He gave it over to death in the stead of all, and offered it to the
Father—doing this, moreover, of His loving-kindness, to the end that, firstly,
all being held to have died in Him, the law involving the ruin of men might be
undone (inasmuch as its power was fully spent in the Lord’s body, and had no
longer holding-ground against men, his peers), and that, secondly, whereas men
had turned toward corruption, He might turn them again toward incorruption, and
quicken them from death by the appropriation31 of His body and by the grace of
the Resurrection, banishing death from them like straw from the fire32 .
For the Word, perceiving that no otherwise could the
corruption of men be undone save by death as a necessary condition, while it
was impossible for the Word to suffer death, being immortal, and Son of the
Father; to this end He takes to Himself a body capable of death, that it, by
partaking of the Word Who is above all, might be worthy to die in the stead of
all, and might, because of the Word which was come to dwell in it, remain
incorruptible, and that thenceforth corruption might be stayed from all by the
Grace of the Resurrection. Whence, by offering unto death the body He Himself
had taken, as an offering and sacrifice free from any stain, straightway He put
away death from all His peers by the offering of an equivalent. 2. For being
over all, the Word of God naturally by offering His own temple and corporeal
instrument for the life33 of
all satisfied the debt by His death. And thus He, the incorruptible Son of God,
being conjoined with all by a like nature, naturally clothed all with
incorruption, by the promise of the resurrection. For the actual corruption in
death has no longer holding-ground against men, by reason of the Word, which by
His one body has come to dwell among them. 3. And like as34 when a great king has entered into
some large city and taken up his abode in one of the houses there, such city is
at all events held worthy of high honour, nor does any enemy or bandit any
longer descend upon it and subject it; but, on the contrary, it is thought
entitled to all care, because of the king’s having taken up his residence in a
single house there: so, too, has it been with the Monarch of all. 4. For now
that He has come to our realm, and taken up his abode in one body among His
peers, henceforth the whole conspiracy of the enemy against mankind is checked,
and the corruption of death which before was prevailing against them is done
away. For the race of men had gone to ruin, had not the Lord and Saviour of
all, the Son of God, come among us to meet the end of death35 .
Now in truth this great work was peculiarly suited to
God’s goodness. I. For if a king, having founded a house or city, if it be
beset by bandits from the carelessness of its inmates, does not by any means
neglect it, but avenges and reclaims it as his own work, having regard not to
the carelessness of the inhabitants, but to what beseems himself; much more did
God the Word of the all-good Father not neglect the race of men, His work,
going to corruption: but, while He blotted out the death which had ensued by
the offering of His own body, He corrected their neglect by His own teaching,
restoring all that was man’s by His own power.
2. And of this one may be assured at the hands of the Saviour’s own inspired writers, if one happen upon their writings, where they say: “For the love of Christ36 constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then all died, and He died for all that we should no longer live unto ourselves, but unto Him Who for our sakes died and rose again,” our Lord Jesus Christ. And, again: “But37 we behold Him, Who hath been made a little lower than the angels, even Jesus, because of the suffering of death crowned with glory and honour, that by the grace of God He should taste of death for every man.” 3. Then He also points out the reason why it was necessary for none other than God the Word Himself to become incarnate; as follows: “For it became Him, for Whom are all things, and through Whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the Captain of their salvation perfect through suffering;” by which words He means, that it belonged to none other to bring man back from the corruption which had begun, than the Word of God, Who had also made them from the beginning. 4. And that it was in order to the sacrifice for bodies such as His own that the Word Himself also assumed a body, to this, also, they refer in these words38 : “Forasmuch then as the children are the sharers in blood and flesh, He also Himself in like manner partook of the same, that through death He might bring to naught Him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; and might deliver them who, through fear of death, were all their lifetime subject to bondage.” 5. For by the sacrifice of His own body, He both put an end to the law which was against us, and made a new beginning of life for us, by the hope of resurrection which He has given us. For since from man it was that death prevailed over men, for this cause conversely, by the Word of God being made man has come about the destruction of death and the resurrection of life; as the man which bore Christ39 saith: “For40 since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive :” and so forth. For no longer now do we die as subject to condemnation; but as men who rise from the dead we await the general resurrection of all, “which41 in its own times He shall show,” even God, Who has also wrought it, and bestowed it upon us. 6. This then is the first cause of the Saviour’s being made man. But one might see from the following reasons also, that His gracious coming amongst us was fitting to have taken place.
God, Who has the power over all things, when He was making
the race of men through His own Word, seeing the weakness of their nature, that
it was not sufficient of itself to know its Maker, nor to get any idea at all
of God; because while He was uncreate, the creatures had been made of nought,
and while He was incorporeal, men had been fashioned in a lower way in the
body, and because in every way the things made fell far short of being able to
comprehend and know their Maker—taking pity, I say, on the race of men,
inasmuch as He is good, He did not leave them destitute of the knowledge of
Himself, lest they should find no profit in existing at all42 .
2. For what profit to the creatures if they knew not their Maker? or how could they be rational without knowing the Word (and Reason) of the Father, in Whom they received their very being? For there would be nothing to distinguish them even from brute creatures if they had knowledge of nothing but earthly things. Nay, why did God make them at all, as He did not wish to be known by them?
3. Whence, lest this should be so, being good, He gives them a share in His own Image, our Lord Jesus Christ, and makes them after His own Image and after His likeness: so that by such grace perceiving the Image, that is, the Word of the Father, they may be able through Him to get an idea of the Father, and knowing their Maker, live the happy and truly blessed life. 4. But men once more in their perversity having set at nought, in spite of all this, the grace given them, so wholly rejected God, and so darkened their soul, as not merely to forget their idea of God, but also to fashion for themselves one invention after another. For not only did they grave idols for themselves, instead of the truth, and honour things that were not before the living God, “and43 serve the creature rather than the Creator,” but, worst of all, they transferred the honour of God even to stocks and stones and to every material object and to men, and went even further than this, as we have said in the former treatise. 5. So far indeed did their impiety go, that they proceeded to worship devils, and proclaimed them as gods, fulfilling their own44 lusts. For they performed, as was said above, offerings of brute animals, and sacrifices of men, as was meet for them45 , binding themselves down all the faster under their maddening inspirations. 6. For this reason it was also that magic arts were taught among them, and oracles in divers places led men astray, and all men ascribed the influences of their birth and existence to the stars and to all the heavenly bodies, having no thought of anything beyond what was visible. 7. And, in a word, everything was full of irreligion and lawlessness, and God alone, and His Word, was unknown, albeit He had not hidden Himself out of men’s sight, nor given the knowledge of Himself in one way only; but had, on the contrary, unfolded it to them in many forms and by many ways.
For whereas the grace of the Divine Image was in itself
sufficient to make known God the Word, and through Him the Father; still God,
knowing the weakness of men, made provision even for their carelessness: so
that if they cared not to know God of themselves, they might be enabled through
the works of creation to avoid ignorance of the Maker. 2. But since men’s
carelessness, by little and little, descends to lower things, God made
provision, once more, even for this weakness of theirs, by sending a law, and
prophets, men such as they knew, so that even if they were not ready to look up
to heaven and know their Creator, they might have their instruction from those
near at hand. For men are able to learn from men more directly about higher
things. 3. So it was open to them, by looking into the height of heaven, and
perceiving the harmony of creation, to know its Ruler, the Word of the Father,
Who, by His own providence over all things makes known the Father to all, and
to this end moves all things, that through Him all may know God. 4. Or, if this
were too much for them, it was possible for them to meet at least the holy men,
and through them to learn of God, the Maker of all things, the Father of
Christ; and that the worship of idols is godlessness, and full of all impiety.
5. Or it was open to them, by knowing the law even, to cease from all
lawlessness and live a virtuous life. For neither was the law for the Jews
alone, nor were the Prophets sent for them only, but, though sent to the Jews
and persecuted by the Jews, they were for all the world a holy school of the
knowledge of God and the conduct of the soul.
6. God’s goodness then and loving-kindness being so great—men nevertheless, overcome by the pleasures of the moment and by the illusions and deceits sent by demons, did not raise their heads toward the truth, but loaded themselves the more with evils and sins, so as no longer to seem rational, but from their ways to be reckoned void of reason.
So then, men having thus become brutalized, and demoniacal
deceit thus clouding every place, and hiding the knowledge of the true God,
what was God to do? To keep still silence at so great a thing, and suffer men
to be led astray by demons and not to know God? 2. And what was the use of man
having been originally made in God’s image? For it had been better for him to
have been made simply like a brute animal, than, once made rational, for him to
live46 the life of the
brutes.
3. Or where was any necessity at all for his receiving the idea of God to begin with? For if he be not fit to receive it even now, it were better it had not been given him at first.
4. Or what profit to God Who has made them, or what glory to Him could it be, if men, made by Him, do not worship Him, but think that others are their makers? For God thus proves to have made these for others instead of for Himself. 5. Once again, a merely human king does not let the lands he has colonized pass to others to serve them, nor go over to other men; but he warns them by letters, and often sends to them by friends, or, if need be, he comes in person, to put them to rebuke in the last resort by his presence, only that they may not serve others and his own work be spent for naught. 6. Shall not God much more spare His own creatures, that they be not led astray from Him and serve things of nought? especially since such going astray proves the cause of their ruin and undoing, and since it was unfitting that they should perish which had once been partakers of God’s image. 7. What then was God to do? or what was to be done save the renewing of that which was in God’s image, so that by it men might once more be able to know Him? But how could this have come to pass save by the presence of the very Image of God, our Lord Jesus Christ? For by men’s means it was impossible, since they are but made after an image ; nor by angels either, for not even they are (God’s) images. Whence the Word of God came in His own person, that, as He was the Image of the Father, He might be able to create afresh the man after the image.
8. But, again, it could not else have taken place had not death and corruption been done away. 9. Whence He took, in natural fitness, a mortal body, that while death might in it be once for all done away, men made after His Image might once more be renewed. None other then was sufficient for this need, save the Image of the Father.
For as, when the likeness painted on a panel has been
effaced by stains from without, he whose likeness it is must needs come once
more to enable the portrait to be renewed on the same wood: for, for the sake
of his picture, even the mere wood on which it is painted is not thrown away,
but the outline is renewed upon it; 2. in the same way also the most holy Son
of the Father, being the Image of the Father, came to our region to renew man
once made in His likeness, and find him, as one lost, by the remission of sins;
as He says Himself in the Gospels: “I came47
to find and to save the lost.” Whence He said to the Jews also: “Except48 a man be born again,” not meaning,
as they thought, birth front woman, but speaking of the soul born and created
anew in the likeness of God’s image. 3. But since wild idolatry and godlessness
occupied the world, and the knowledge of God was hid, whose part was it to
teach the world concerning the Father? Man’s, might one say? But it was not in
man’s power to penetrate everywhere beneath the sun; for neither had they the
physical strength to run so far, nor would they be able to claim credence in
this matter, nor were they sufficient by themselves to withstand the deceit and
impositions of evil spirits. 4. For where all were smitten and confused in soul
from demoniacal deceit, and the vanity of idols, how was it possible for them
to win over man’s soul and man’s mind—whereas they cannot even see them? Or how
can a man convert what he does not see? 5. But perhaps one might say creation
was enough; but if creation were enough, these great evils would never have
come to pass. For creation was there already, and all the same, men were
grovelling in the same error concerning God. 6. Who, then, was needed. save the
Word of God, that sees both soul and mind, and that gives movement to all
things in creation, and by them makes known the Father? For He who by His own
Providence and ordering of all things was teaching men concerning the Father,
He it was that could renew this same teaching as well. 7. How, then, could this
have been done? Perhaps one might say, that the same means were open as before,
for Him to shew forth the truth about the Father once more by means of the work
of creation. But this was no longer a sure means. Quite the contrary; for men
missed seeing this before, and have turned their eyes no longer upward but
downward. 8. Whence, naturally, willing to profit men, He sojourns here as man,
taking to Himself a body like the others, and from things of earth, that is by
the works of His body [He teaches them], so that they who would not know Him
from His Providence and rule over all things, may even from the works done by
His actual body know the Word of God which is in the body, and through Him the
Father.
For as a kind teacher who cares for His disciples, if some
of them cannot profit by higher subjects, comes down to their level, and
teaches them at any rate by simpler courses; so also did the Word of God. As
Paul also says: “For seeing49
that in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom knew not God, it was
God’s good pleasure through the foolishness of the word preached to save them
that believe.” 2. For seeing that men, having rejected the contemplation of
God, and with their eyes downward, as though sunk in the deep, were seeking
about for God in nature and in the world of sense, feigning gods for themselves
of mortal men and demons; to this end the loving and general Saviour of all,
the Word of God, takes to Himself a body, and as Man walks among men and meets
the senses of all men half-way50
, to the end, I say, that they who think that God is corporeal may from what
the Lord effects by His body perceive the truth, and through Him recognize51 the Father. 3. So, men as they
were, and human in all their thoughts, on whatever objects they fixed their
senses, there they saw themselves met half way52 , and taught the truth from every
side.
4. For if they looked with awe upon the Creation, yet they saw how she confessed Christ as Lord; or if their mind was swayed toward men, so as to think them gods, yet from the Saviour’s works, supposing they compared them, the Saviour alone among men appeared Son of God; for there were no such works done among the rest as have been done by the Word of God. 5. Or if they were biassed toward evil spirits, even, yet seeing them cast out by the Word, they were to know that He alone, the Word of God, was God, and that the spirits were none. 6. Or if their mind had already sunk even to the dead, so as to worship heroes, and the gods spoken of in the poets, yet, seeing the Saviour’s resurrection, they were to confess them to be false gods, and that the Lord alone is true, the Word of the Father, that was Lord even of death.
7. For this cause He was both born and appeared as Man, and died, and rose again, dulling and casting into the shade the works of all former men by His own, that in whatever direction the bias of men might be, from thence He might recall them, and teach them of His own true Father, as He Himself says: “I came to save and to find that which was lost53 .”
For men’s mind having finally fallen to things of sense,
the Word disguised Himself by appearing in a body, that He might, as Man,
transfer men to Himself, and centre their senses on Himself, and, men seeing
Him thenceforth as Man, persuade them by the works He did that He is not Man
only, but also God, and the Word and Wisdom of the true God. 2. This, too, is
what Paul means to point out when he says: “That ye54 being rooted and grounded in love,
may be strong to apprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length,
and height and depth, and to know the love of Christ which passeth knowledge,
that ye may be filled unto all the fulness of God.” 3. For by the Word
revealing Himself everywhere, both above and beneath, and in the depth and in
the breadth—above, in the creation; beneath, in becoming man; in the depth, in
Hades; and in the breadth, in the world—all things have been filled with the
knowledge of God. 4. Now for this cause, also, He did not immediately upon His
coming accomplish His sacrifice on behalf of all, by offering His body to death
and raising it again, for by this55
means He would have made Himself invisible. But He made Himself visible enough
by what56 He did, abiding in
it, and doing such works, and shewing such signs, as made Him known no longer
as Man, but as God the Word. 5. For by His becoming Man, the Saviour was to
accomplish both works of love; first, in putting away death from us and
renewing us again; secondly, being unseen and invisible, in manifesting and
making Himself known by His works to be the Word of the Father, and the Ruler
and King of the universe.
For He was not, as might be imagined, circumscribed in the
body, nor, while present in the body, was He absent elsewhere; nor, while He
moved the body, was the universe left void of His working and Providence; but,
thing most marvellous, Word as He was, so far from being contained by anything,
He rather contained all things Himself; and just as while present in the whole
of Creation, He is at once distinct in being from the universe, and present in
all things by His own power,—giving order to all things, and over all and in
all revealing His own providence, and giving life to each thing and all things,
including the whole without being included, but being in His own Father alone
wholly and in every respect,—2. thus, even while present in a human body and
Himself quickening it, He was, without inconsistency, quickening the universe
as well, and was in every process of nature, and was outside the whole, and
while known from the body by His works, He was none the less manifest from the
working of the universe as well. 3. Now, it is the function of soul to behold
even what is outside its own body, by acts of thought, without, however,
working outside its own body, or moving by its presence things remote from the
body. Never, that is, does a man, by thinking of things at a distance, by that
fact either move or displace them; nor if a man were to sit in his own house
and reason about the heavenly bodies, would he by that fact either move the sun
or make the heavens revolve. But he sees that they move and have their being,
without being actually able to influence them. 4. Now, the Word of God in His
man’s nature was not like that; for He was not bound to His body, but rather
was Himself wielding it, so that He was not only in it, but was actually in
everything, and while external to the universe, abode in His Father only. 5.
And this was the wonderful thing that He was at once walking as man, and as the
Word was quickening all things, and as the Son was dwelling with His Father. So
that not even when the Virgin bore Him did He suffer any change, nor by being
in the body was [His glory] dulled: but, on the contrary, He sanctified the
body also.
6. For not even by being in the universe does He share in its nature, but all things, on the contrary, are quickened and sustained by Him.
7. For if the sun too, which was made by Him, and which we see, as it revolves in the heaven, is not defiled57 by touching the bodies upon earth, nor is it put out by darkness, but on the contrary itself illuminates and cleanses them also, much less was the all-holy Word of God, Maker and Lord also of the sun, defiled by being made known in the body; on the contrary, being incorruptible, He quickened and cleansed the body also, which was in itself mortal: “who58 did,” for so it says, “no sin, neither was guile found in His mouth.”
Accordingly, when inspired writers on this matter speak of
Him as eating and being born, understand59
that the body, as body, was born, and sustained with food corresponding to its
nature, while God, the Word Himself, Who was united with the body, while
ordering all things, also by the works He did in the body shewed Himself to be
not man, but God the Word. But these things are said of Him, because the actual
body which ate, was born, and suffered, belonged to none other but to the Lord:
and because, having become man, it was proper for these things to be predicated
of Him as man, to shew Him to have a body in truth, and not in seeming. 2. But
just as from these things He was known to be bodily present, so from the works
He did in the body He made Himself known to be Son of God. Whence also He cried
to the unbelieving Jews; “If60 I
do not the works of My Father, believe Me not. But if I do them, though ye
believe not Me, believe My works; that ye may know and understand that the
Father is in Me, and I in the Father.” 3. For just as, though invisible, He is
known through the works of creation; so, having become man, and being in the
body unseen, it may be known from His works that He Who can do these is not
man, but the Power and Word of God. 4. For His charging evil spirits, and their
being driven forth, this deed is not of man, but of God. Or who that saw Him
healing the diseases to which the human race is subject, can still think Him
man and not God? For He cleansed lepers, made lame men to walk, opened the
hearing of deaf men, made blind men to see again, and in a word drove away from
men all diseases and infirmities: from which acts it was possible even for the
most ordinary observer to see His Godhead. For who that saw Him give back61 what was deficient to men born
lacking, and open the eyes of the man blind from his birth, would have failed
to perceive that the nature of men was subject to Him, and that He was its
Artificer and Maker? For He that gave back that which the man from his birth
had not, must be, it is surely evident, the Lord also of men’s natural birth.
5. Therefore, even to begin with, when He was descending to us, He fashioned
His body for Himself from a Virgin, thus to afford to all no small proof of His
Godhead, in that He Who formed this is also Maker of everything else as well.
For who, seeing a body proceeding forth from a Virgin alone without man, can
fail to infer that He Who appears in it is Maker and Lord of other bodies also?
6. Or who, seeing the substance of water changed and transformed into wine,
fails to perceive that He Who did this is Lord and Creator of the substance of
all waters? For to this end He went upon the sea also as its Master, and walked
as on dry land, to afford evidence to them that saw it of His lordship over all
things. And in feeding so vast a multitude on little, and of His own self
yielding abundance where none was, so that from five loaves five thousand had
enough, and left so much again over, did He shew Himself to be any other than
the very Lord Whose Providence is over all things?
But all this it seemed well for the Saviour to do; that
since men had failed to know His Providence, revealed in the Universe, and had
failed to perceive His Godhead shewn in creation, they might at any rate from
the works of His body recover their sight, and through Him receive an idea of
the knowledge of the Father, inferring, as I said before, from particular cases
His Providence over the whole. 2. For who that saw His power over evil spirits,
or who that saw the evil spirits confess that He was their Lord, will hold his
mind any longer in doubt whether this be the Son and Wisdom and Power of God?
3. For He made even the creation break silence: in that even at His death,
marvellous to relate, or rather at His actual trophy over death—the Cross I
mean—all creation was confessing that He that was made manifest and suffered in
the body was not man merely, but the Son of God and Saviour of all. For the sun
hid His face, and the earth quaked and the mountains were rent: all men were
awed. Now these things shewed that Christ on the Cross was God, while all
creation was His slave, and was witnessing by its fear to its Master’s
presence. Thus, then, God the Word shewed Himself to men by His works. But our
next step must be to recount and speak of the end of His bodily life and
course, and of the nature of the death of His body; especially as this is the
sum of our faith, and all men without exception are full of it: so that you may
know that no whir the less from this also Christ is known to be God and the Son
of God.
We have, then, now stated in part, as far as it was
possible, and as ourselves had been able to understand, the reason of His
bodily appearing that it was in the power of none other to turn the corruptible
to incorruption, except the Saviour Himself, that had at the beginning also
made all things out of nought and that none other could create anew the
likeness of God’s image for men, save the Image of the Father; and that none
other could render the mortal immortal, save our Lord Jesus Christ, Who is the
Very Life62 ; and that none
other could teach men of the Father, and destroy the worship of idols, save the
Word, that orders all things and is alone the true Only-begotten Son of the
Father. 2. But since it was necessary also that the debt owing from all should
be paid again: for, as I have already said63
, it was owing that all should die, for which especial cause, indeed, He came
among us: to this intent, after the proofs of His Godhead from His works, He
next offered up His sacrifice also on behalf of all, yielding His Temple to
death in the stead of all, in order firstly to make men quit and free of their
old trespass, and further to shew Himself more powerful even than death,
displaying His own body incorruptible, as first-fruits of the resurrection of
all. 3. And do not be surprised if we frequently64 repeat the same words on the same
subject. For since we are speaking of the counsel of God, therefore we expound
the same sense in more than one form, lest we should seem to be leaving
anything out, and incur the charge of inadequate treatment: for it is better to
submit to the blame of repetition than to leave out anything that ought to be
set down. 4. The body, then, as sharing the same nature with all, for it was a
human body, though by an unparalleled miracle it was formed of a virgin only,
yet being mortal, was to die also, conformably to its peers. But by virtue of
the union of the Word with it, it was no longer subject to corruption according
to its own nature, but by reason of the Word that was come to dwell65 in it it was placed out of the
reach of corruption. 5. And so it was that two marvels came to pass at once,
that the death of all was accomplished in the Lord’s body, and that death and
corruption were wholly done away by reason of the Word that was united with it.
For there was need of death, and death must needs be suffered on behalf of all,
that the debt owing from all might be paid. 6. Whence, as I said before, the
Word, since it was not possible for Him to die, as He was immortal, took to
Himself a body such as could die, that He might offer it as His own in the
stead of all, and as suffering, through His union66 with it, on behalf of all, “Bring67 to nought Him that had the power
of death, that is the devil; and might deliver them who through fear of death
were all their lifetime subject to bondage.”
Why, now that the common Saviour of all has died on our
behalf, we, the faithful in Christ, no longer die the death as before, agreeably
to the warning of the law; for this condemnation has ceased; but, corruption
ceasing and being put away by the grace of the Resurrection, henceforth we are
only dissolved, agreeably to our bodies’ mortal nature, at the time God has
fixed for each, that we may be able to gain a better resurrection. 2. For like
the seeds which are cast into the earth, we do not perish by dissolution, but
sown in the earth, shall rise again, death having been brought to nought by the
grace of the Saviour. Hence it is that blessed Paul, who was made a surety of
the Resurrection to all, says: “This corruptible68 must put on incorruption, and this
mortal must put on immortality; but when this corruptible shall have put on
incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be
brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory. O
death where is thy sting? O grave where is thy victory?” 3. Why, then, one
might say, if it were necessary for Him to yield up His body to death in the stead
of all, did He not lay it aside as man privately, instead of going as far as
even to be crucified? For it were more fitting for Him to have laid His body
aside honourably, than ignominiously to endure a death like this.
4. Now, see to it, I reply, whether such an objection be not merely human, whereas what the Saviour did is truly divine and for many reasons worthy of His Godhead. Firstly, be cause the death which befalls men comes to them agreeably to the weakness of their nature; for, unable to continue in one stay, they are dissolved with time. Hence, too, diseases befall them, and they fall sick and die. But the Lord is not weak, but is the Power of God and Word of God and Very Life. 5. If, then, He had laid aside His body somewhere in private, and upon a bed, after the manner of men, it would have been thought that He also did this agreeably to the weakness of His nature, and because there was nothing in him more than in other men. But since He was, firstly, the Life and the Word of God, and it was necessary, secondly, for the death on behalf of all to be accomplished, for this cause, on the one hand, because He was life and power, the body gained strength in Him; 6. while on the other, as death must needs come to pass, He did not Himself take, but received at others’ hands; the occasion of perfecting His sacrifice. Since it was not fit, either, that the Lord should fall sick, who healed the diseases of others; nor again was it right for that body to lose its strength, in which He gives strength to the weaknesses of others also. 7. Why, then, did He not prevent death, as He did sickness? Because it was for this that He had the body, and it was unfitting to prevent it, lest the Resurrection also should be hindered, while yet it was equally unfitting for sickness to precede His death, lest it should be thought weakness on the part of Him that was in the body. Did He not then hunger? Yes; He hungered, agreeably to the properties of His body. But He did not perish of hunger, because of the Lord that wore it. Hence, even if He died to ransom all, yet He saw not corruption. For [His body] rose again in perfect soundness, since the body belonged to none other, but to the very Life.
But it were better, one might say, to have hidden from the
designs of the Jews, that He might guard His body altogether from death. Now
let such an one be told that this too was unbefitting the Lord. For as it was
not fitting for the Word of God, being the Life, to inflict death Himself on
His own body, so neither was it suitable to fly from death offered by others,
but rather to follow it up unto destruction, for which reason He naturally
neither laid aside His body of His own accord, nor, again, fled from the Jews
when they took counsel against Him. 2. But this did not shew weakness on the
Word’s part, but, on the contrary, shewed Him to be Saviour and Life; in that He
both awaited death to destroy it, and hasted to accomplish the death offered
Him for the salvation of all. 3. And besides, the Saviour came to accomplish
not His own death, but the death of men; whence He did not lay aside His body
by a death of His own69 —
for He was Life and had none—but received that death which came from men, in
order perfectly to do away with this when it met Him in His own body. 4. Again,
from the following also one might see the reasonableness of the Lord’s body
meeting this end. The Lord was especially concerned for the resurrection of the
body which He was set to accomplish. For what He was to do was to manifest it
as a monument of victory over death, and to assure all of His having effected
the blotting out of corruption, and of the incorruption of their bodies from
thenceforward; as a gage of which and a proof of the resurrection in store for
all, He has preserved His own body incorrupt. 5. If, then, once more, His body
had fallen sick, and the word had been sundered from it in the sight of all, it
would have been unbecoming that He who healed the diseases of others should
suffer His own instrument to waste in sickness. For how could His driving out
the diseases of others have been believed70
in if His own temple fell sick in Him71
? For either He had been mocked as unable to drive away diseases, or if He
could, but did not, He would be thought insensible toward others also.
But even if, without any disease and without any pain, He
had hidden His body away privily and by Himself “in72 a corner,” or in a desert place,
or in a house, or anywhere, and afterwards suddenly appeared and said that He
had been raised from the dead, He would have seemed on all hands to be telling
idle tales73 , and what He said
about the Resurrection would have been all the more discredited, as there was
no one at all to witness to His death. Now, death must precede resurrection, as
it would be no resurrection did not death precede; so that if the death of His
body had taken place anywhere in secret, the death not being apparent nor
taking place before witnesses, His Resurrection too had been hidden and without
evidence. 2. Or why, while when He had risen He proclaimed the Resurrection,
should He cause His death to take place in secret? or why, while He drove out
evil spirits in the presence of all, and made the man blind from his birth
recover his sight, and changed the water into wine, that by these means He
might be believed to be the Word of God, should He not manifest His mortal
nature as incorruptible in the presence of all, that He might be believed
Himself to be the Life? 3. Or how were His disciples to have boldness in
speaking of the Resurrection, were they not able to say that He first died? Or
how could they be believed, saying that death had first taken place and then
the Resurrection, had they not had as witnesses of His death the men before
whom they spoke with boldness? For if, even as it was, when His death and
Resurrection had taken place in the sight of all, the Pharisees of that day
would not believe, but compelled even those who had seen the Resurrection to
deny it, why, surely, if these things had happened in secret, how many pretexts
for disbelief would they have devised? 4. Or how could the end of death, and
the victory over it be proved, unless challenging it before the eyes of all He
had shewn it to be dead, annulled for the future by the incorruption of His
body?
But what others also might have said, we must anticipate
in reply. For perhaps a man might say even as follows: If it was necessary for
His death to take place before all, and with witnesses, that the story of His
Resurrection also might be believed, it would have been better at any rate for
Him to have devised for Himself a glorious death, if only to escape the
ignominy of the Cross. 2. But had He done even this, He would give ground for
suspicion against Himself, that He was not powerful against every death, but
only against the death devised for74
Him; and so again there would have been a pretext for disbelief about the
Resurrection all the same. So death came to His body, not from Himself, but
from hostile counsels, in order that whatever death they offered to the
Saviour, this He might utterly do away. 3. And just as a noble wrestler, great
in skill and courage, does not pick out his antagonists for himself, lest he
should raise a suspicion of his being afraid of some of them, but puts it in
the choice of the onlookers, and especially so if they happen to be his
enemies, so that against whomsoever they match him, him he may throw, and be
believed superior to them all; so also the Life of all, our Lord and Saviour,
even Christ, did not devise a death for His own body, so as not to appear to be
fearing some other death; but He accepted on the Cross, and endured, a death
inflicted by others, and above all by His enemies, which they thought dreadful
and ignominious and not to be faced; so that this also being destroyed, both He
Himself might be believed to be the Life, and the power of death be brought
utterly to nought. 4. So something surprising and startling has happened; for
the death, which they thought to inflict as a disgrace, was actually a monument
of victory against death itself. Whence neither did He suffer the death of
John, his head being severed, nor, as Esaias, was He sawn in sunder; in order
that even in death He might still keep His body undivided and in perfect
soundness, and no pretext be afforded to those that would divide the Church.
And thus much in reply to those without who pile up
arguments for themselves. But if any of our own people also inquire, not from
love of debate, but from love of learning, why He suffered death in none other
way save on the Cross, let him also be told that no other way than this was
good for us, and that it was well that the Lord suffered this for oursakes. 2.
For if He came Himself to bear the curse laid upon us, how else could He have
“become75 a curse,” unless He
received the death set for a curse? and that is the Cross. For this is exactly
what is written: “Cursed76 is
he that hangeth on a tree.” 3. Again, if the Lord’s death is the ransom of all,
and by His death “the middle77
wall of partition” is broken down, and the calling of the nations is brought
about, how would He have called us to Him, had He not been crucified? For it is
only on the cross that a man dies with his hands spread out. Whence it was
fitting for the Lord to bear this also and to spread out His hands, that with
the one He might draw the ancient people, and with the other those from the
Gentiles, and unite both in Himself. 4. For this is what He Himself has said,
signifying by what manner of death He was to ransom all: “I, when78 I am lifted up,” He saith, “shall
draw all men unto Me.” 5. And once more, if the devil, the enemy of our race,
having fallen from heaven, wanders about our lower atmosphere, and there
bearing rule over his fellow-spirits, as his peers in disobedience, not only
works illusions by their means in them that are deceived, but tries to hinder
them that are going up (and about this79
the Apostle says: “According to the prince of the power of the air, of the
spirit that now worketh in the sons of disobedience”); while the Lord came to
cast down the devil, and clear the air and prepare the way for us up into
heaven, as said the Apostle: “Through80
the veil, that is to say, His flesh”—and this must needs be by death—well, by
what other kind of death could this have come to pass, than by one which took
place in the air, I mean the cross? for only he that is perfected on the cross
dies in the air. Whence it was quite fitting that the Lord suffered this death.
6. For thus being lifted up He cleared the air81 of the malignity both of the devil
and of demons of all kinds, as He says: “I beheld82 Satan as lightning fall from
heaven;” and made a new opening of the way up into heaven as He says once more:
“Lift83 up your gates, O ye
princes, and be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors.” For it was not the Word
Himself that needed an opening of the gates, being Lord of all; nor were any of
His works closed to their Maker; but we it was that needed it whom He carried
up by His own body. For as He offered it to death on behalf of all, so by it He
once more made ready the way up into the heavens.
The death on the Cross, then, for us has proved seemly and
fitting, and its cause has been shewn to be reasonable in every respect; and it
may justly be argued that in no other way than by the Cross was it right for
the salvation of all to take place. For not even thus—not even on the Cross—did
He leave Himself concealed; but far otherwise, while He made creation witness
to the presence of its Maker, He suffered not the temple of His body to remain
long, but having merely shewn it to be dead, by the contact of death with it,
He straightway raised it up on the third day, bearing away, as the mark of
victory and the triumph over death, the incorruptibility and impassibility
which resulted to His body. 2. For He could, even immediately on death, have
raised His body and shewn it alive; but this also the Saviour, in wise
foresight, did not do. For one might have said that He had not did at all, or
that death had not come into perfect contact with Him, if He had manifested the
Resurrection at once. 3. Perhaps, again, had the interval of His dying and
rising again been one of two days84
only, the glory of His incorruption would have been obscure. So in order that
the body might be proved to be dead, the Word tarried yet one intermediate day,
and on the third shewed it incorruptible to all. 4. So then, that the death on
the Cross might be proved, He raised His body on the third day. 5. But lest, by
raising it up when it had remained a long time and been completely corrupted,
He should be disbelieved, as though He had exchanged it for some other body—for
a man might also from lapse of time distrust what he saw, and forget what had
taken place—for this cause He waited not more than three days; nor did He keep
long in suspense those whom He had told about the Resurrection:
6. but while the word was still echoing in their ears and their eyes were still expectant and their mind in suspense, and while those who had slain Him were still living on earth, and were on the spot and could witness to the death of the Lord’s body, the Son of God Himself, after an interval of three days, shewed His body, once dead, immortal and incorruptible; and it was made manifest to all that it was not from any natural weakness of the Word that dwelt in it that the body had died, but in order that in it death might be done away by the power of the Saviour.
For that death is destroyed, and that the Cross is become
the victory over it, and that it has no more power but is verily dead, this is
no small proof, or rather an evident warrant, that it is despised by all
Christ’s disciples, and that they all take the aggressive against it and no
longer fear it; but by the sign of the Cross and by faith in Christ tread it
down as dead. 2. For of old, before the divine sojourn of the Saviour
took place, even to the saints death was terrible85 , and all wept for the dead as
though they perished. But now that the Saviour has raised His body, death is no
longer terrible; for all who believe in Christ tread him under as nought, and
choose rather to die than to deny their faith in Christ. For they verily know
that when they die they are not destroyed, but actually [begin to] live, and
become incorruptible through the Resurrection. 3. And that devil that once
maliciously exulted in death, now that its86
pains were loosed, remained the only one truly dead. And a proof of this is,
that before men believe Christ, they see in death an object of terror, and play
the coward before him. But when they are gone over to Christ’s faith and
teaching, their contempt for death is so great that they even eagerly rush upon
it, and become witnesses for the Resurrection the Saviour has accomplished
against it. For while still tender in years they make haste to die, and not men
only, but women also, exercise themselves by bodily discipline against it. So
weak has he become, that even women who were formerly deceived by him, now mock
at him as dead and paralyzed. 4. For as when a tyrant has been defeated by a
real king, and bound hand and foot, then all that pass by laugh him to scorn,
buffeting and reviling him, no longer fearing his fury and barbarity, because
of the king who has conquered him; so also, death having been conquered and
exposed by the Saviour on the Cross, and bound hand and foot, all they who are
in Christ, as they pass by, trample on him, and witnessing to Christ scoff at
death, jesting at him, and saying what has been written against him of old: “O
death87 , where is thy
victory? O grave, where is thy sting.”
Is this, then, a slight proof of the weakness of death? or
is it a slight demonstration of the victory won over him by the Saviour, when
the youths and young maidens that are in Christ despise this life and practise
to die? 2. For man is by nature afraid of death and of the dissolution of the
body; but there is this most startling fact, that he who has put on the faith
of the Cross despises even what is naturally fearful, and for Christ’s sake is
not afraid of death. 3. And just as, whereas fire has the natural property of
burning, if some one said there was a substance which did not fear its burning,
but on the contrary proved it weak—as the asbestos among the Indians is said to
do—then one who did not believe the story, if he wished to put it to the test,
is at any rate, after putting on the fireproof material and touching the fire,
thereupon assured of the weakness attributed88 to the fire: 4. or if any one
wished to see the tyrant bound, at any rate by going into the country and
domain of his conqueror he may see the man, a terror to others, reduced to
weakness; so if a man is incredulous even still after so many proofs and after
so many who have become martyrs in Christ, and after the scorn shewn for death
every day by those who are illustrious in Christ, still, if his mind be even
yet doubtful as to whether death has been brought to nought and had an end, he
does well to wonder at so great a thing, only let him not prove obstinate in
incredulity, nor case-hardened in the face of what is so plain.
5. But just as he who has got the asbestos knows that fire has no burning power over it, and as he who would see the tyrant bound goes over to the empire of his conqueror, so too let him who is incredulous about the victory over death receive the faith of Christ, and pass over to His teaching, and he shall see the weakness of death, and the triumph over it. For many who were formerly incredulous and scoffers have afterwards believed and so despised death as even to become martyrs for Christ Himself.
Now if by the sign of the Cross, and by faith in Christ,
death is trampled down, it must be evident before the tribunal of truth that it
is none other than Christ Himself that has displayed trophies and triumphs over
death, and made him lose all his strength. 2. And if, while previously death
was strong, and for that reason terrible, now after the sojourn of the Saviour
and the death and Resurrection of His body it is despised, it must be evident
that death has been brought to nought and conquered by the very Christ that
ascended the Cross. 3. For as, if after night-time the sun rises, and the whole
region of earth is illumined by him, it is at any rate not open to doubt that
it is the sun who has revealed his light everywhere, that has also driven away
the dark and given light to all things; so, now that death has come into
contempt, and been trodden under foot, from the time when the Saviour’s saving
manifestation in the flesh and His death on the Cross took place, it must be
quite plain that it is the very Saviour that also appeared in the body, Who has
brought death to nought, and Who displays the signs of victory over him day by
day in His own disciples.
4. For when one sees men, weak by nature, leaping forward to death, and not fearing its corruption nor frightened of the descent into Hades, but with eager soul challenging it; and not flinching from torture, but on the contrary, for Christ’s sake electing to rush upon death in preference to life upon earth, or even if one be an eye-witness of men and females and young children rushing and leaping upon death for the sake of Christ’s religion; who is so silly, or who is so incredulous, or who so maimed in his mind, as not to see and infer that Christ, to Whom the people witness, Himself supplies and gives to each the victory over death, depriving him of all his power in each one of them that hold His faith and bear the sign of the Cross.
5. For he that sees the serpent trodden under foot, especially knowing his former fierceness no longer doubts that he is dead and has quite lost his strength, unless he is perverted in mind and has not even his bodily senses sound. For who that sees a lion, either, made sport of by children, fails to see that he is either dead or has lost all his power? 6. Just as, then, it is possible to see with the eyes the truth of all this, so, now that death is made sport of and despised by believers in Christ let none any longer doubt, nor any prove incredulous, of death having been brought to nought by Christ, and the corruption of death destroyed and stayed.
What we have so far said, then, is no small proof that
death has been brought to naught, and that the Cross of the Lord is a sign of
victory over him. But of the Resurrection of the body to immortality thereupon
accomplished by Christ, the common Saviour and true Life of all, the
demonstration by facts is clearer than arguments to those whose mental vision
is sound. 2. For if, as our argument shewed, death has been brought to nought,
and because of Christ all tread him under foot, much more did He Himself first
tread him down with His own body, and bring him to nought. But supposing death
slain by Him, what could have happened save the rising again of His body, and
its being displayed as a monument of victory against death? or how could death
have been shewn to be brought to nought unless the Lord’s body had risen? But
if this demonstration of the Resurrection seem to any one insufficient, let him
be assured of what is said even from what takes place before his eyes. 3. For
whereas on a man’s decease he can put forth no power, but his influence lasts
to the grave and thenceforth ceases; and actions, and power over men, belong to
the living only; let him who will, see and be judge, confessing the truth from
what appears to sight. 4. For now that the Saviour works so great things among
men, and day by day is invisibly persuading so great a multitude from every
side, both from them that dwell in Greece and in foreign lands, to come over to
His faith, and all to obey His teaching, will any one still hold his mind in
doubt whether a Resurrection has been accomplished by the Saviour, and whether
Christ is alive, or rather is Himself the Life? 5. Or is it like a dead man to
be pricking the consciences of men, so that they deny their hereditary laws and
bow before the teaching of Christ? Or how, if he is no longer active (for this
is proper to one dead), does he stay from their activity those who are active
and alive, so that the adulterer no longer commits adultery, and the murderer
murders no more, nor is the inflicter of wrong any longer grasping, and the
profane is henceforth religious? Or how, if He be not risen but is dead, does
He drive away, and pursue, and cast down those false gods said by the
unbelievers to be alive, and the demons they worship? 6. For where Christ is
named, and His faith, there all idolatry is deposed and all imposture of evil
spirits is exposed, and any spirit is unable to endure even the name, nay even
on barely hearing it flies and disappears. But this work is not that of one
dead, but of one that lives—and especially of God. 7. In particular, it would
be ridiculous to say that while the spirits cast out by Him and the idols
brought to nought are alive, He who chases them away, and by His power prevents
their even appearing, yea, and is being confessed by them all to be Son of God,
is dead.
But they who disbelieve in the Resurrection afford a
strong proof against themselves, if instead of all the spirits and the gods
worshipped by them casting out Christ, Who, they say, is dead, Christ on the
contrary proves them all to be dead. 2. For if it be true that one dead can
exert no power, while the Saviour does daily so many works, drawing men to
religion, persuading to virtue, teaching of immortality, leading on to a desire
for heavenly things, revealing the knowledge of the Father, inspiring strength
to meet death, shewing Himself to each one, and displacing the godlessness of
idolatry, and the gods and spirits of the unbelievers can do none of these
things, but rather shew themselves dead at the presence of Christ, their pomp
being reduced to impotence and vanity; whereas by the sign of the Cross all
magic is stopped, and all witchcraft brought to nought, and all the idols are
being deserted and left, and every unruly pleasure is checked, and every one is
looking up from earth to heaven: Whom is one to pronounce dead? Christ, that is
doing so many works? But to work is not proper to one dead. Or him that exerts
no power at all, but lies as it were without life? which is essentially proper
to the idols and spirits, dead as they are. 3. For the Son of God is89 “living and active,” and works day
by day, and brings about the salvation of all. But death is daily proved to
have lost all his power, and idols and spirits are proved to be dead rather
than Christ, so that henceforth no man can any longer doubt of the Resurrection
of His body.
4. But he who is incredulous of the Resurrection of the Lord’s body would seem to be ignorant of the power of the Word and Wisdom of God. For if He took a body to Himself at all, and—in reasonable consistency, as our argument shewed— appropriated it as His own, what was the Lord to do with it? or what should be the end of the body when the Word had once descended upon it? For it could not but die, inasmuch as it was mortal, and to be offered unto death on behalf of all: for which purpose it was that the Saviour fashioned it for Himself. But it was impossible for it to remain dead, because it had been made the temple of life. Whence, while it died as mortal, it came to life again by reason of the Life in it; and of its Resurrection the works are a sign.
But if, because He is not seen, His having risen at all is
disbelieved, it is high time for those who refuse belief to deny the very
course of Nature. For it is God’s peculiar property at once to be invisible and
yet to be known from His works, as has been already stated above.
2. If, then, the works are not there, they do well to disbelieve what does not appear. But if the works cry aloud and shew it clearly, why do they choose to deny the life so manifestly due to the Resurrection? For even if they be maimed in their intelligence, yet even with the external senses men may see the unimpeachable power and Godhead of Christ.
3. For even a blind man, if he see not the sun, yet if he but take hold of the warmth the sun gives out, knows that there is a sun above the earth. Thus let our opponents also, even if they believe not as yet, being still blind to the truth, yet at least knowing His power by others who believe, not deny the Godhead of Christ and the Resurrection accomplished by Him. 4. For it is plain that if Christ be dead, He could not be expelling demons and spoiling idols; for a dead man the spirits would not have obeyed. But if they be manifestly expelled by the naming of His name, it must be evident that He is not dead; especially as spirits, seeing even what is unseen by men, could tell if Christ were dead and refuse Him any obedience at all. 5. But as it is, what irreligious men believe not, the spirits see—that He is God,-and hence they fly and fall at His feet, saying just what they uttered when He was in the body: “We90 know Thee Who Thou art, the Holy One of God;” and, “Ah, what have we to do with Thee, Thou Son of God? I pray Thee, torment me not.” 6. As then demons confess Him, and His works bear Him witness day by day, it must be evident, and let none brazen it out against the truth, both that the Saviour raised His own body, and that He is the true Son of God, being from Him, as from His Father, His own Word, and Wisdom, and Power, Who in ages later took a body for the salvation of all, and taught the world concerning the Father, and brought death to nought, and bestowed incorruption upon all by the promise of the Resurrection, having raised His own body as a first-fruits of this, and having displayed it by the sign of the Cross as a monument of victory over death and its corruption.
These things being so, and the Resurrection of His body and
the victory gained over death by the Saviour being clearly proved, come now let
us put to rebuke both the disbelief of the Jews and the scoffing of the
Gentiles. 2. For these, perhaps, are the points where Jews express incredulity,
while Gentiles laugh, finding fault with the unseemliness of the Cross, and of
the Word of God becoming man. But our argument shall not delay to grapple with
both especially as the proofs at our command against them are clear as day. 3.
For Jews in their incredulity may be refuted from the Scriptures, which even
themselves read; for this text and that, and, in a word, the whole inspired
Scripture, cries aloud concerning these things, as even its express words
abundantly shew. For prophets proclaimed beforehand concerning the wonder of
the Virgin and the birth from her, saying: “Lo, the91 Virgin shall be with child, and
shall bring forth a Son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which is, being
interpreted, God with us.” 4. But Moses, the truly great, and whom they believe
to speak truth, with reference to the Saviour’s becoming man, having estimated
what was said as important, and assured of its truth, set it down in these
words: “There92
shall rise a star out of Jacob, and a man out of Israel, and he shall break in
pieces the captains of Moab.” And again: “How lovely are thy habitations O
Jacob, thy tabernacles O Israel, as shadowing gardens, and as parks by the
rivers, and as tabernacles which the Lord hath fixed, as cedars by the waters.
A man shall come forth out of his seed, and shall be Lord over many peoples.”
And again, Esaias: “Before93
the Child know how to call father or mother, he shall take the power of
Damascus and the spoils of Samaria before the king of Assyria.”
5. That a man, then, shall appear is foretold in those words. But that He that is to come is Lord of all, they predict once more as follows: “Behold94 the Lord sitteth upon a light cloud, and shall come into Egypt, and the graven images of Egypt shall be shaken.” For from thence also it is that the Father calls Him back, saying: “I called95 My Son out of Egypt.”
Nor is even His death passed over in silence: on the
contrary, it is referred to in the divine Scriptures, even exceeding clearly.
For to the end that none should err for want of instruction :in the actual
events, they feared not to mention even the cause of His death,—that He suffers
it not for His own sake, but for the immortality and salvation of all, and the
counsels of the Jews against Him and the indignities offered Him at their
hands. 2. They say then: “A man96
in stripes, and knowing how to bear weakness, for his face is turned away: he
was dishonoured and held in no account. He beareth our sins, and is in pain on
our account; and we reckoned him to be in labour, and in stripes, and in
ill-usage; but he was wounded for our sins, and made weak for our wickedness.
The chastisement of our peace was upon him, and by his stripes we were healed.”
O marvel at the loving-kindness of the Word, that for our sakes He is
dishonoured, that we may be brought to honour. “For all we,” it says, “like
sheep were gone astray; man had erred in his way; and the Lord delivered him
for our sins; and he openeth not his mouth, because he hath been evilly
entreated. As a sheep was he brought to the slaughter, and as a lamb dumb
before his shearer, so openeth he not his mouth: in his abasement his judgment
was taken away97 .”
3. Then lest any should from His suffering conceive Him to be a common man,
Holy Writ anticipates the surmises of man, and declares the power (which
worked) for Him98 ,
and the difference of His nature compared with ourselves, saying: “But who
shall declare his generation? For his life is taken away99 from the earth. From the wickedness
of the people was he brought to death. And I will give the wicked instead of
his burial, and the rich instead of his death; for he did no wickedness,
neither was guile found in his mouth. And the Lord will cleanse him from his
stripes.”
But, perhaps, having heard the prophecy of His death, you
ask to learn also what is set forth concerning the Cross. For not even this is
passed over: it is displayed by the holy men with great plainness. 2. For first
Moses predicts it, and that with a loud voice, when he says: “Ye shall see100 your Life hanging before your
eyes, and shall not believe.” 3. And next, the prophets after him witness of
this, saying: “But101 I
as an innocent lamb brought to be slain, knew it not; they counselled an evil
counsel against me, saying, Hither and let us cast a tree upon his102 bread, and efface him from the
land of the living.” 4. And again: “They pierced103 my hands and my feet, they
numbered all my bones, they parted my garments among them, and for my vesture
they cast lots.” 5. Now a death raised aloft and that takes place on a tree,
could be none other than the Cross: and again, in no other death are the hands
and feet pierced, save on the Cross only. 6. But since by the sojourn of the
Saviour among men all nations also on every side began to know God; they did
not leave this point, either, without a reference but mention is made of this
matter as well in the Holy Scriptures. For “there104 a shall be,” he saith, “the root
of Jesse, and he that riseth to rule the nations, on him shall the nations
hope.” This then is a little in proof of what has happened. 7. But all
Scripture teems with refutations of the disbelief of the Jews. For which of the
righteous men and holy prophets, and patriarchs, recorded in the divine
Scriptures, ever had his corporal birth of a virgin only? Or what woman has
sufficed without man for the conception of human kind? Was not Abel born of
Adam, Enoch of Jared, Noe of Lamech, and Abraham of Tharra, Isaac of Abraham,
Jacob of Isaac? Was not Judas born of Jacob, and Moses and Aaron of Ameram? Was
not Samuel born of Elkana, was not David of Jesse, was not Solomon of David,
was not Ezechias of Achaz, was not Josias of Amos, was not Esaias of Amos, was
not Jeremy of Chelchias, was not Ezechiel of Buzi? Had not each a father as
author of his existence? Who then is he that is born of a virgin only? For the
prophet made exceeding much of this sign. 8. Or whose birth did a star in the
skies forerun, to announce to the world him that was born? For when Moses was
born, he was hid by his parents: David was not heard of, even by those of his
neighbourhood, inasmuch as even the great Samuel knew him not, but asked, had
Jesse yet another son? Abraham again became known to his neighbours as105 a great man only subsequently to
his birth. But of Christ’s birth the witness was not man, but a star in that
heaven whence He was descending.
But what king that ever was, before he had strength to
call father or mother, reigned and gained triumphs over his enemies106 ? Did not David come to the throne
at thirty years of age, and Solomon, when he had grown to be a young man? Did
not Joas enter on the kingdom when seven years old, and Josias, a still later
king, receive the government about the seventh year of his age? And yet they at
that age had strength to call father or mother. 2. Who, then, is there that was
reigning and spoiling his enemies almost before his birth? Or what king of this
sort has ever been in Israel and in Juda—let the Jews, who have searched out
the matter, tell us—in whom all the nations have placed their hopes and had
peace, instead of being at enmity with them on every side? 3. For as long as
Jerusalem stood there was war without respite betwixt them, and they all fought
with Israel; the Assyrians oppressed them, the Egyptians persecuted them, the
Babylonians fell upon them; and, strange to say, they had even the Syrians their
neighbours at war against them. Or did not David war against them of Moab, and
smite the Syrians, Josias guard against his neighbours, and Ezechias quail at
the boasting of Senacherim, and Amalek make war against Moses, and the Amorites
oppose him, and the inhabitants of Jericho array themselves against Jesus son
of Naue? And, in a word, treaties of friendship had no place between the
nations and Israel. Who, then, it is on whom the nations are to set their hope,
it is worth while to see. For there must be such an one, as it is impossible
for the prophet to have spoken falsely. 4. But which of the holy prophets or of
the early patriarchs has died on the Cross for the salvation of all? Or who was
wounded and destroyed for the healing of all? Or which of the righteous men, or
kings, went down to Egypt, so that at his coming the idols of Egypt fell107 ? For Abraham went thither, but
idolatry prevailed universally all the same. Moses was born there, and the
deluded worship of the people was there none the less.
Or who among those recorded in Scripture was pierced in
the hands and feet, or hung at all upon a tree, and was sacrificed on a cross
for the salvation of all? For Abraham died, ending his life on a bed; Isaac and
Jacob also died with their feet raised on a bed; Moses and Aaron died on the
mountain; David in his house, without being the object of any conspiracy at the
hands of the people; true, he was pursued by Saul, but he was preserved unhurt.
Esaias was sawn asunder, but not hung on a tree. Jeremy was shamefully treated,
but did not die under condemnation; Ezechie suffered, not however for the
people, but to indicate what was to come upon the people.
2. Again, these, even where they suffered, were men resembling all in their common nature; but he that is declared in Scripture to suffer on behalf of all is called not merely man, but the Life of all, albeit He was in fact like men in nature. For “ye shall108 see,” it says, “your Life hanging before your eyes;” and “who shall declare his generation?” For one can ascertain the genealogy of all the saints, and declare it from the beginning, and of whom each was born; but the generation of Him that is the Life the Scriptures refer to as not to be declared. 3. Who then is he of whom the Divine Scriptures say this? Or who is so great that even the prophets predict of him such great things? None else, now, is found in the Scriptures but the common Saviour of all, the Word of God, our Lord Jesus Christ. For He it is that proceeded from a virgin and appeared as man on the earth, and whose generation after the flesh cannot be declared. For there is none that can tell His father after the flesh, His body not being of a man, but of a virgin alone; 4. so that no one can declare the corporal generation of the Saviour from a man, in the same way as one can draw up a genealogy of David and of Moses and of all the patriarchs. For He it is that caused the star also to mark the birth of His body; since it was fit that the Word, coming down from heaven, should have His constellation also from heaven, and it was fitting that the King of Creation when He came forth should be openly recognized by all creation. 5. Why, He was born in Judaea, and men from Persia came to worship Him. He it is that even before His appearing in the body won the victory over His demon adversaries and a triumph over idolatry. All heathen at any rate from every region, abjuring their hereditary tradition and the impiety of idols, are now placing their hope in Christ, and enrolling themselves under Him, the like of which you may see with your own eyes.
6. For at no other time has the impiety of the Egyptians ceased, save when the Lord of all, riding as it were upon a cloud, came down there in the body and brought to nought the delusion of idols, and brought over all to Himself, and through Himself to the Father.
7. He it is that was crucified before the sun and all creation as witnesses, and before those who put Him to death: and by His death has salvation come to all, and all creation been ransomed. He is the Life of all, and He it is that as a sheep yielded His body to death as a substitute, for the salvation of all, even though the Jews believe it not.
For if they do not think these proofs sufficient, let them
be persuaded at any rate by other reasons, drawn from the oracles they
themselves possess. For of whom do the prophets say: “I was109 made manifest to them that sought
me not, I was found of them that asked not for me: I said Behold, here am I, to
the nation that had not called upon my name; I stretched out my hands to a
disobedient and gainsaying people.” 2. Who, then, one might say to the Jews, is
he that was made manifest? For if it is the prophet, let them say when he was
hid, afterward to appear again. And what manner of prophet is this, that was
not only made manifest from obscurity, but also stretched out his hands on the
Cross? None surely of the righteous, save the Word of God only, Who,
incorporeal by nature, appeared for our sakes in the body and suffered for all.
3. Or if not even this is sufficient for them, let them at least be silenced by
another proof, seeing how clear its demonstrative force is. For the Scripture
says: “Be strong110
ye hands that hang down, and feeble knees; comfort ye, ye of faint mind; be
strong, fear not. Behold, our God recompenseth judgment; He shall come and save
us. Then shall the eyes of the blind be opened, and the ears of the deaf shall
hear; then shall the lame man leap as an hart, and the tongue of the stammerers
shall be plain.” 4. Now what can they say to this, or how can they dare to face
this at all? For the prophecy not only indicates that God is to sojourn here,
but it announces the signs and the time of His coming. For they connect the
blind recovering their sight, and the lame walking, and the deaf hearing, and
the tongue of the stammerers being made plain, with the Divine Coming which is
to take place. Let them say, then, when such signs have come to pass in Israel,
or where in Jewry anything of the sort has occurred.
5. Naaman, a leper, was cleansed, but no deaf man heard nor lame walked. Elias raised a dead man; so did Eliseus; but none blind from birth regained his sight. For in good truth, to raise a dead man is a great thing, but it is not like the wonder wrought by the Saviour. Only, if Scripture has not passed over the case of the leper, and of the dead son of the widow, certainly, had it come to pass that a lame man also had walked and a blind man recovered his sight, the narrative would not have omitted to mention this also. Since then nothing is said in the Scriptures, it is evident that these things had never taken place before. 6. When, then, have they taken place, save when the Word of God Himself came in the body? Or when did He come, if not when lame men walked, and stammerers were made to speak plain, and deaf men heard, and men blind from birth regained their sight? For this was the very thing the Jews said who then witnessed it, because they had not heard of these things having taken place at any other time: “Since111 the world began it was never heard that any one opened the eyes of a man born blind. If this man were not from God, He could do nothing.”
But perhaps, being unable, even they, to fight continually
against plain facts, they will, without denying what is written, maintain that
they are looking for these things, and that the Word of God is not yet come.
For this it is on which they are for ever harping, not blushing to brazen it
out in the face of plain facts. 2. But on this one point, above all, they shall
be all the more refuted, not at our hands, but at those of the most wise
Daniel, who marks both the actual date, and the divine sojourn of the Saviour,
saying: “Seventy112
weeks are cut short upon thy people, and upon the holy city, for a full end to be
made of sin, and for sins to be sealed up, and to blot out iniquities, and to
make atonement for iniquities, and to bring everlasting righteousness, and to
seal vision and prophet, and to anoint a Holy of Holies; and thou shalt know
and understand from the going forth of the word to restore113 and to build Jerusalem unto Christ
the Prince” 3. Perhaps with regard to the other (prophecies) they may be able
even to find excuses and to put off what is written to a future time. But what
can they say to this, or can they face it at all? Where not only is the Christ
referred to, but He that is to be anointed is declared to be not man simply,
but Holy of Holies; and Jerusalem is to stand till His coming, and thenceforth,
prophet and vision cease in Israel.
4. David was anointed of old, and Solomon and Ezechias; but then, nevertheless, Jerusalem and the place stood, and prophets were prophesying: God and Asaph and Nathan; and, later, Esaias and Osee and Amos and others. And again, the actual men that were anointed were called holy, and not Holy of Holies.
5. But if they shield themselves with the captivity, and say that because of it Jerusalem was not, what can they say about the prophets too? For in fact when first the people went down to Babylon, Daniel and Jeremy were there, and Ezechiel and Aggaeus and Zachary were prophesying.
So the Jews are trifling, and the time in question, which
they refer to the future, is actually come. For when did prophet and vision
cease from Israel, save when Christ came, the Holy of Holies? For it is a sign,
and an important proof, of the coming of the Word of God, that Jerusalem no
longer stands, nor is any prophet raised up nor vision revealed to them,—and
that very naturally. 2. For when He that was signified was come, what need was
there any longer of any to signify Him? When the truth was there, what need any
more of the shadow? For this was the reason of their prophesying at
all,—namely, till the true Righteousness should come, and He that was to ransom
the sins of all. And this was why Jerusalem stood till then- namely, that there
they might be exercised in the types as a preparation for the reality. 3. So
when the Holy of Holies was come, naturally vision and prophecy were sealed and
the kingdom of Jerusalem ceased. For kings were to be anointed among them only
until the Holy of Holies should have been anointed; and Jacob prophesies that
the kingdom of the Jews should be established until Him, as follows :—“The
ruler114 shall not fail from
Juda, nor the Prince from his loins, until that which islaid up for him shall come;
and he is the expectation of the nations.” 4. Whence the Saviour also Himself
cried aloud and said: “The115
law and the prophets prophesied until John.” If then there is now among the
Jews king or prophet or vision, they do well to deny the Christ that is come.
But if there is neither king nor vision, but from that time forth all prophecy
is sealed and the city and temple taken, why are they so irreligious and so
perverse as to see what has happened, and yet to deny Christ, Who has brought
it all to pass? Or why, when they see even heathens deserting their idols, and
placing their hope, through Christ, on the God of Israel, do they deny Christ,
Who was born of the root of Jesse after the flesh and henceforth is King? For
if the nations were worshipping some other God, and not confessing the God of
Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and Moses, then, once more, they would be doing
well in alleging that God hadnot come. 5. But if the Gentiles are honouring the
same God that gave the law to Moses and made the promise to Abraham, and Whose
word the Jews dishonoured,—why are they ignorant, or rather why do they choose
to ignore, that the Lord foretold by the Scriptures has shone forth upon the
world, and appeared to it in bodily form, as the Scripture said: “The116 Lord God hath shined upon us;” and
again: “He117
sent His Word and healed them ;” and again: “Not118 a messenger, not an angel, but the
Lord Himself saved them?” 6. Their state may be compared to that of one out of
his right mind, who sees the earth illumined by the sun, but denies the sun
that illumines it. For what more is there for him whom they expect to do, when
he is come? To call the heathen? But they are called already. To make prophecy,
and king, and vision to cease? This too has already come to pass. To expose the
godlessness of idolatry? It is already exposed and condemned. Or to destroy
death? He is already destroyed. 7. What then has not come to pass, that the
Christ must do? What is left unfulfilled, that the Jews should now disbelieve
with impunity? For if, I say,—which is just what we actually see,—there is no
longer king nor prophet nor Jerusalem nor sacrifice nor vision among them, but
even the whole earth is filled with the knowledge of God, and gentiles, leaving
their godlessness, are now taking refuge with the God of Abraham, through the
Word, even our Lord Jesus Christ, then it must be plain, even to those whoare
exceedingly obstinate, that the Christ is come, and that He has illumined
absolutely all with His light, and given them the true and divine teaching
concerning His Father.
8. So one can fairly refute the Jews by these and by other arguments from the Divine Scriptures.
Answer to the Greeks. Do They Recognise the Logos? If He Manifests Himself in the Organism of the Universe, Why Not in One Body? for a Human Body is a Part of the Same Whole.
But one cannot but be utterly astonished at the Gentiles,
who, while they laugh at what is no matter for jesting, are themselves
insensible to their own disgrace, which they do not see that they have set up
in the shape of stocks and stones. 2. Only, as our argument is not lacking in
demonstrative proof, come let us put them also to shame on reasonable grounds,
—mainly from what we ourselves also see. For what is there on our side that is
absurd, or worthy of derision? Is it merely our saying that the Word has been
made manifest in the body? But this even they will join in owning to have
happened without any absurdity, if they show themselves friends of truth. 3. If
then they deny that there is a Word of God at all, they do so gratuitously119 , jesting at what they know not.
4. But if they confess that there is a Word of God, and He ruler of the
universe, and that in Him the Father has produced the creation, and that by His
Providence the whole receives light and life and being, and that He reigns over
all, so that from the works of His providence He is known, and through Him the
Father,—consider, I pray you, whether they be not unwittingly raising the jest
against themselves. 5. The philosophers of the Greeks say that the universe is
a great body120
;and rightly so. For we see it and its parts as objects of our senses. If,
then, the Word of God is in the Universe, which is a body, and has united
Himself with the whole and with all its parts, what is there surprising or
absurd if we say that He has united Himself121 with man also.
6. For if it were absurd for Him to have been in a body at all, it would be absurd for Him to be united with the whole either, and to be giving light and movement to all things by His providence. For the whole also is a body.
7. But if it beseems Him to unite Himself with the universe, and to be made known in the whole, it must beseem Him also to appear in a human body, and that by Him it should be illumined and work. For mankind is part of the whole as well as the rest. And if it be unseemly for a part to have been adopted as His instrument to teach men of His Godhead, it must be most absurd that He should be made known even by the whole universe.
For just as, while the whole body is quickened and
illumined by man, supposing one said it were absurd that man’s power should
also be in the toe, he would be thought foolish; because, while granting that
he pervades and works in the whole, he demurs to his being in the part also;
thus he who grants and believes that the Word of God is in the whole Universe,
and that the whole is illumined and moved by Him, should not think it absurd
that a single human body also should receive movement and light from Him. 2.
But if it is because the human race is a thing created and has been made out of
nothing, that they regard that manifestation of the Saviour in man, which we
speak of, as not seemly, it is high time for them to eject Him from creation
also; for it too has been brought into existence by the Word out of nothing. 3.
But if, even though creation be a thing made, it is not absurd that the Word
should be in it, then neither is it absurd that He should be in man. For
whatever idea they form of the whole, they must necessarily apply the like idea
to the part. For man also, as I said before, is a part of the whole. 4. Thus it
is not at all unseemly that the Word should be in man, while all things are
deriving from Him their light and movement and light, as also their authors
say, “In122
him we live and move and have our being.” 5. So, then, what is there to scoff
at in what we say, if the Word has used that, wherein He is, as an instrument
to manifest Himself? For were He not in it, neither could He have used it; but
if we have previously allowed that He is in the whole and in its parts, what is
there incredible in His, manifesting Himself in that wherein He is?
6. For by His own power He is united123 wholly with each and all, and orders all things without stint, so that no one could have called it out of place for Him to speak, and make known Himself and His Father, by means of sun, if He so willed, or moon, or heaven, or earth, or waters, or fire124 ; inasmuch as He holds in one all things at once, and is in fact not only in all but also in the part in question, and there invisibly manifests Himself. In like manner it cannot be absurd if, ordering as He does the whole, and giving life to all things, and having willed to make Himself known through men, He has used as His instrument a human body to manifest the truth and knowledge of the Father. For humanity, too, is an actual part of the whole.
7. And as Mind, pervading man all through, is interpreted by a part of the body, I mean the tongue, without any one saying, I suppose, that the essence of the mind is on that account lowered, so if the Word, pervading all things, has used a human instrument, this cannot appear unseemly. For, as I have said previously, if it be unseemly to have used a body as an instrument, it is unseemly also for Him to be in the Whole.
Now, if they ask, Why then did He not appear by means of
other and nobler parts of creation, and use some nobler instrument, as the sun,
or moon, or stars, or fire, or air, instead of man merely? let them know that
the Lord came not to make a display, but to heal and teach those who were
suffering. 2. For the way for one aiming at display would be, just to appear,
and to dazzle the beholders; but for one seeking to heal and teach the way is,
not simply to sojourn here, but to give himself to the aid of those in want,
and to appear as they who need him can bear it; that he may not, by exceeding
the requirements of the sufferers, trouble the very persons that need him,
rendering God’s appearance useless to them. 3. Now, nothing in creation had
gone astray with regard to their notions of God, save man only. Why, neither
sun, nor moon, nor heaven, nor the stars, nor water, nor air had swerved from
their order ; but knowing their Artificer and Sovereign, the Word, they remain
as they were made125 .
But men alone, having rejected what was good, then devised things of nought
instead of the truth, and have ascribed the honour due to God, and their
knowledge of Him, to demons and men in the shape of stones. 4. With reason,
then, since it were unworthy of the Divine Goodness to overlook so grave a
matter, while yet men were not able to recognise Him as ordering and guiding
the whole, He takes to Himself as an instrument a part of the whole, His human
body, and unites126
Himself with that, in order that since men could not recognise Him in the
whole, they should not fail to know Him in the part; and since they could not
look up to His invisible power, might be able, at any rate, from what resembled
themselves to reason to Him and to contemplate Him. 5. For, men as they are,
they will be able to know His Father more quickly and directly by a body of
like nature and by the divine works wrought through it, judging by comparison
that they are not human, but the works of God, which are done by Him, 6. And if
it were absurd, as they say, for the Word to be known through the works of the
body, it would likewise be absurd for Him to be known through the works of the
universe. For just as He is in creation, and yet does not partake of its nature
in the least degree, but rather all things partake127 of His power; so while He used the
body as His instrument He partook of no corporeal property, but, on the
contrary, Himself sanctified even the body. 7. For if even Plato, who is in
such repute among the Greeks, says128
that its author, beholding the universe tempest-tossed, and in peril of going
down to the place of chaos, takes his seat at the helm of the soul and comes to
the rescue and corrects all its calamities; what is there incredible in what we
say, that, mankind being in error, the Word lighted down129 upon it and appeared as man, that
He might save it in its tempest by His guidance and goodness?
But perhaps, shamed into agreeing with this,they will
choose to say that God, if He wished to reform and to save mankind, ought to
have done so by a mere fiat130
, without His word taking a body, in just the same way as He did formerly, when
He produced them out of nothing. 2. To this objection of theirs a reasonable
answer would be: that formerly, nothing being in existence at all, what was
needed to make everything was a fiat and the bare will to do so. But when man
had once been made, and necessity demanded a cure, not for things that were
not, but for things that had come to be, it was naturally consequent that the
Physician and Saviour should appear in what had come to be, in order also to
curethe things that were. For this cause, then, He has become man, and used His
body as a human instrument. 3. For if this were not the right way, how was the
Word, choosing to use an instrument, to appear? or whence was He to take it,
save from those already in being, and in need of His Godhead by means of one
like themselves? For it was not things without being that needed salvation, so
that a bare command should suffice, but man, already in existence, was going to
corruption and ruin131 .
It was then natural and right that the Word should use a human instrument and
reveal Himself everywhither. 4. Secondly, you must know this also, that the
corruption which had set in was not external to the body, but had become
attached to it; and it was required that, instead of corruption, life should
cleave to it; so that, just as death has been engendered in the body, so life
may be engendered in it also. 5. Now if death were external to the body, it
would be proper for life also to have been engendered externally to it. But if
death was wound closely to the body and was ruling over it as though united to
it, it was required that life also should be would closely to the body, that so
the body, by putting on life in its stead, should cast off corruption. Besides,
even supposing that the Word had come outside the body, and not in it, death
would indeed have been defeated by Him, in perfect accordance with nature,
inasmuch as death has no power against the Life; but the corruption attached to
the body would have remained in it none the less132 . 6. For this cause the Saviour
reasonably put on Him a body, in order that the body, becoming wound closely to
the Life, should no longer, as mortal, abide in death, but, as having put on
immortality, should thenceforth rise again and remain immortal. For, once it
had put on corruption, it could not have risen again unless it had put on life.
And death likewise could not, from its very nature, appear, save in the body.
Therefore He put on a body, that He might find death in the body, and blot it
out. For how could the Lord have been proved at all to be the Life, had He not
quickened what was mortal? 7. And just as, whereas stubble is naturally
destructible by fire, supposing (firstly) a man keeps fire away from the
stubble, though it is not burned, yet the stubble remains, for all that, merely
stubble, fearing the threat of the fire—for fire has the natural property of
consuming it; while if a man (secondly) encloses it with a quantity of
asbestos, the substance said133
to be an antidote to fire, the stubble no longer dreads the fire, being secured
by its enclosure in incombustible matter; 8. in this very way one may say, with
regard to the body and death, that if death had been kept from the body by a
mere command on His part, it would none the less have been mortal and
corruptible, according to the nature of bodies; but, that this should not be,
it put on the incorporeal Word of God, and thus no longer fears either death or
corruption, for it has life as a garment, and corruption is done away in it.
Consistently, therefore, the Word of God took a body and
has made use of a human instrument, in order to quicken the body also, and as
He is known in creation by His works so to work in man as well, and to shew
Himself everywhere, leaving nothing void of His own divinity, and of the
knowledge of Him. 2. For I resume, and repeat what I said before, that the
Saviour did this in order that, as He fills all things on all sides by His
presence, so also He might fill all things with the knowledge of Him, as the
divine Scripture also says134
: “The whole earth was filled with the knowledge of the Lord.” 3. For if a man
will but look up to heaven, he sees its Order, or if he cannot raise his face
to heaven, but only to man, he sees His power, beyond comparison with that of
men, shewn by His works, and learns that He alone among men is God the Word. Or
if a man is gone astray among demons, and is in fear of them, he may see this
man drive them out, and make up his mind that He is their Master. Or if a man
has sunk to the waters135 ,
and thinks that they are God,-as the Egyptians, for instance, reverence the
water, —he may see its nature changed by Him,and learn that the Lord is Creator
of the waters. 4. But if a man is gone down even to Hades, and stands in awe of
the heroes who have descended thither, regarding them as gods, yet he may see
the fact of Christ’s Resurrection and victory over death, and infer that among
them also Christ alone is true God and Lord. 5. For the Lord touched all parts
of creation, and freed and undeceived all of them from every illusion; as Paul
says: “Having136
put off from Himself the principalities and the powers, He triumphed on the
Cross :” that no one might by any possibility be any longer deceived, but
everywhere might find the true Word of God. 6. For thus man, shut in on every
side137 , and beholding the
divinity of the Word unfolded everywhere, that is, in heaven, in Hades, in man,
upon earth, is no longer exposed to deceit concerning God, but is to worship
Christ alone, and through Him come rightly to know the Father. 7. By these
arguments, then, on grounds of reason, the Gentiles in their turn will fairly
be put to shame by us. But if they deem the arguments insufficient to shame
them, let them be assured of what we are saying at any rate by facts obvious to
the sight of all.
When did men begin to desert the worshipping of idols,
save since God, the true Word of God, has come among men? Or when have the
oracles among the Greeks, and everywhere, ceased and become empty, save when
the Saviour has manifested Himself upon earth?
2. Or when did those who are called gods and heroes in the poets begin to be convicted of being merely mortal men138 , save since the Lord erected His conquest of death, and preserved incorruptible the body he had taken, raising it from the dead? 3. Or when did the deceitfulness and madness of demons fall into contempt, save when the power of God, the Word, the Master of all these as well, condescending because of man’s weakness, appeared on earth? Or when139 did the art and the schools of magic begin to be trodden down, save when the divine manifestation of the Word took place among men? 4. And, in a word, at what time has the wisdom of the Greeks become foolish, save when the true Wisdom of God manifested itself on earth? For formerly the whole world and every place was led astray by the worship-ping of idols, and men regarded nothing else but the idols as gods. But now, all the world over, men are deserting the superstition of the idols, and taking refuge with Christ; and, worshipping Him as God, are by His means coming to know that Father also Whom they knew not. 5. And, marvellous fact, whereas the objects of worship were various and of vast number, and each place had its own idol, and he who was accounted a god among them had no power to pass over to the neighbouring place, so as to persuade those of neighbouring peoples to worship him, but was barely served even among his own people; for no one else worshipped his neighbour’s god—on the contrary, each man kept to his own idol140 , thinking it to be lord of all;—Christ alone is worshipped as one and the same among all peoples; and what the weakness of the idols could not do—to persuade, namely, even those dwelling close at hand,—this Christ has done, persuading not only those close at hand, but simply the entire world, to worship one and the same Lord, and through Him God, even His Father.
And whereas formerly every place was full of the deceit of
the oracles141 ,
and the oracles at Delphi and Dodona, and in Boeotia142 and Lycia143 and Libya144 and Egypt and those of the Cabiri145 , and the Pythoness, were held in
repute by men’s imagination, now, since Christ has begun to be preached
everywhere, their madness also has ceased and there is none among them to
divine any more. 2. And whereas formerly demons used to deceive146 men’s fancy, occupying springs or
rivers, trees or stones, and thus imposed upon the simple by their juggleries;
now, after the divine visitation of the Word, their deception has ceased. For
by the Sign of the Cross, though a man but use it, he drives out their deceits.
3. And while formerly men held to be gods the Zeus and Cronos and Apollo and
the heroes mentioned in the poets, and went astray in honouring them; now that
the Saviour has appeared among men, those others have been exposed as mortal
men147 , and Christ alone
has been recognised among men as the true God, the Word of God. 4. And what is
one to say of the magic148
esteemed among them? that before the Word sojourned among us this was strong
and active among Egyptians, and Chaldees, and Indians, and inspired awe in
those who saw it; but that by the presence of the Truth, and the Appearing of the
Word, it also has been thoroughly confuted, and brought wholly to nought. 5.
But as to Gentile wisdom, and the sounding pretensions of the philosophers, I
think none can need our argument, since the wonder is before the eyes of all,
that while the wise among the Greeks had written so much, and were unable to
persuade even a few149
from their own neighbourhood, concerning immortality and a virtuous life,
Christ alone, by ordinary language, and by men not clever with the tongue, has
throughout all the world persuaded whole churches full of men to despise death,
and to mind the things of immortality; to overlook what is temporal and to turn
their eyes to what is eternal; to think nothing of earthly glory and to strive
only for the heavenly.
Now these arguments of ours do not amount merely to words,
but have in actual experience a witness to their truth. 2. For let him that
will, go up and behold the proof of virtue in the virgins of Christ and in the
young men that practise holy chastity150
, and the assurance of immortality in so great a band of His martyrs. 3. And
let him come who would test by experience what we have now said, and in the
very presence of the deceit of demons and the imposture of oracles and the
marvels of magic, let him use the Sign of that Cross which is laughed at among
them, and he shall see how by its means demons fly, oracles cease, all magic
and witchcraft is brought to nought.
4. Who, then, and how great is this Christ, Who by His own Name and Presence casts into the shade and brings to nought all things on every side, and is alone strong against all, and has filled the whole world with His teaching? Let the Greeks tell us, who are pleased to laugh, and blush not. 5. For if He is a man, how then has one man exceeded the power of all whom even themselves bold to be gods, and convicted them by His own power of being nothing? But if they call Him a magician, how can it be that by a magician all magic is destroyed, instead of being confirmed? For if He conquered particular magicians, or prevailed over one only, it would be proper for them to hold that He excelled the rest by superior skill; 6. but if His Cross has won the victory over absolutely all magic, and over the very name of it, it must be plain that the Saviour is not a magician, seeing that even those demons who are invoked by the other magicians fly from Him as their Master.
7. Who He is, then, let the Greeks tell us, whose only serious pursuit is jesting. Perhaps they might say that He, too, was a demon, and hence His strength. But say this as they will, they will have the laugh against them, for they can once more be put to shame by our former proofs. For how is it possible that He should be a demon who drives the demons out? 8. For if He simply drove out particular demons, it might property be held that by the chief of demons He prevailed against the lesser, just as the Jews said to Him when they wished to insult Him. But if, by His Name being named,all madness of the demons is uprooted and chased away, it must be evident that here, too, they are wrong, and that our Lord and Saviour Christ is not, as they think, some demoniacal power. 9. Then, if the Saviour is neither a man simply, nor a magician, nor some demon, but has by His own Godhead brought to nought and cast into the shade both the doctrine found in the poets and the delusion of the demons and the wisdom of the Gentiles, it must be plain and will be owned by all, that this is the true Son of God, even the Word and Wisdom and Power of the Father froth the beginning. For this is why His works also are no works of man, but are recognised to be above man, and truly God’s works, both from the facts in themselves, and from comparison with [the rest of] mankind.
For what man, that ever was born, formed a body for
himself from a virgin alone? Or what man ever healed such diseases as the
common Lord of all? Or who has restored what was wanting to man’s nature, and
made one blind from his birth to see? 2. Asclepius was deified among them,
because he practised medicine and found out herbs for bodies that were sick;
not forming them himself out of the earth, but discovering them by science
drawn from nature. But what is this to what was done by the Saviour, in that,
instead of healing a wound, He modified a man’s original nature, and restored
the body whole. 3. Heracles is worshipped as a god among the Greeks because he
fought against men, his peers, and destroyed wild beasts by guile. What is this
to what was done by the Word, in driving away from man diseases and demons and
death itself? Dionysus is worshipped among them because he has taught man drunkenness;
but the true Saviour and Lord of all, for teaching temperance, is mocked by
these people.
4. But let these matters pass. What will they say to the other miracles of His Godhead? At what man’s death was the sun darkened and the earth shaken? Lo even to this day men are dying, and they died also of old. When did any such-like wonder happen in their case? 5. Or, to pass over the deeds done through His body, and mention those after its rising again: what man’s doctrine that ever was has prevailed everywhere, one and the same, from one end of the earth to the other, so that his worship has winged its way through every land? 6. Or why, if Christ is, as they say, a man, and not God the Word, is not His worship prevented by the gods they have from passing into the same land where they are? Or why on the contrary does the Word Himself, sojourning here, by His teaching stop their worship and put their deception to shame?
Many before this Man have been kings and tyrants of the
world, many are on record who have been wise men and magicians, among the
Chaldaeans and Egyptians and Indians; which of these, I say, not after death, but
while still alive, was ever able so far to prevail as to fill the whole earth
with his teaching and reform so great a multitude from the superstition of
idols, as our Saviour has brought over from idols to Himself? 2. The
philosophers of the Greeks have composed many works with plausibility and
verbal skill; what result, then, have they exhibited so great as has the Cross
of Christ? For the refinements they taught were plausible enough till they
died; but even the influence they seemed to have while alive was subject to
their mutual rivalries ; and they were emulous, and declaimed against one
another. 3. But the Word of God, most strange fact, teaching in meaner
language, has cast into the shade the choice sophists; and while He has, by
drawing all to Himself, brought their schools to nought, He has filled His own
churches; and the marvellous thing is, that by going down as man to death, He
has brought to nought the sounding utterances of the wise151 concerning idols. 4. For whose
death ever drove out demons? or whose death did demons ever fear, as they did
that of Christ? For where the Saviour’s name is named, there every demon is
driven out. Or who has so rid men of the passions of the natural man, that
whoremongers are chaste, and murderers no longer hold the sword, and those who
were formerly mastered by cowardice play the man? 5. And, in short, who
persuaded men of barbarous countries and heathen men in divers places to lay
aside their madness, and to mind peace, if it be not the Faith of Christ and the
Sign of the Cross? Or who else has given men such assurance of immortality, as
has the Cross of Christ, and the Resurrection of His Body? 6. For although the
Greeks have told all manner of false tales, yet they were not able to feign a
Resurrection of their idols,—for it never crossed their mind, whether it be at
all possible for the body again to exist after death. And here one would most
especially accept their testimony, inasmuch as by this opinion they have
exposed the weakness of their own idolatry, while leaving the possibility open
to Christ, so that hence also He might be made known among all as Son of God.
Which of mankind, again, after his death, or else while
living, taught concerning virginity, and that this virtue was not impossible
among men? But Christ, our Saviour and King of all, had such power in His
teaching concerning it, that even children not yet arrived at the lawful age
vow that virginity which lies beyond the law. 2. What man has ever yet been
able to pass so far as to come among Scythians and Ethiopians, or Persians or
Armenians or Goths, or those we hear of beyond the ocean or those beyond
Hyrcania, or even the Egyptians and Chaldees, men that mind magic and are
superstitious beyond nature and savage in their ways, and to preach at all
about virtue and self-control, and against the worshipping of idols, as has the
Lord of all, the Power of God, our Lord Jesus Christ? 3. Who not only preached
by means of His own disciples, but also carried persuasion to men’s mind, to
lay aside the fierceness of their manners, and no longer to serve their
ancestral gods, but to learn to know Him, and through Him to worship the
Father. 4. For formerly, while in idolatry, Greeks and Barbarians used to war
against each other, and were actually cruel to their own kin. For it was
impossible for any one to cross sea or land at all, without arming the hand
with swords152 ,
because of their implacable fighting among themselves. 5. For the whole course
of their life was carried on by arms, and the sword with them took the place of
a staff, and was their support in every emergency; and still, as I said before,
they were serving idols, and offering sacrifices to demons, while for all their
idolatrous superstition they could not be reclaimed from this spirit. 6. But
when they have come over to the school of Christ, then, strangely enough, as
men truly pricked in conscience, they have laid aside the savagery of their murders
and no longer mind the things of war: but all is at peace with them, and from
henceforth what makes for friendship is to their liking.
Who then is He that has done this, or who is He that has
united in peace men that hated one another, save the beloved Son of the Father,
the common Saviour of all, even Jesus Christ, Who by His own love underwent all
things for our salvation? For even from of old it was prophesied of the peace
He was to usher in, where the Scripture says: “They153 shall beat their swords into
ploughshares, and their pikes into sickles, and nation shall not take the sword
against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.” 2. And this is at least
not incredible, inasmuch as even now those barbarians who have an innate
savagery of manners, while they still sacrifice to the idols of their country,
are mad against one another, and cannot endure to be a single hour without
weapons: 3. but when they hear the teaching of Christ, straightway instead of
fighting they turn to husbandry, and instead of arming their hands with weapons
they raise them in prayer, and in a word, in place of fighting among
themselves, henceforth they arm against the devil and against evil spirits,
subduing these by self-restraint and virtue of soul. 4. Now this is at once a
proof of the divinity of the Saviour, since what men could not learn among
idols154 they have learned
from Him; and no small exposure of the weakness and nothingness of demons and
idols. For demons, knowing their own weakness, for this reason formerly set men
to make war against one another, lest, if they ceased from mutual strife, they
should turn to battle against demons.
5. Why, they who become disciples of Christ, instead of warring with each other, stand arrayed against demons by their habits and their virtuous actions: and they rout them, and mock at their captain the devil; so that in youth they are self-restrained, in temptations endure, in labours persevere, when insulted are patient, when robbed make light of it: and, wonderful as it is, they despise even death and become martyrs of Christ.
And to mention one proof of the divinity of the Saviour,
which is indeed utterly surprising, —what mere man or magician or tyrant or
king was ever able by himself to engage with so many, and to fight the battle
against all idolatry and the whole demoniacal host and all magic, and all the
wisdom of the Greeks, while they were so strong and still flourishing and
imposing upon all, and at one onset to check them all, as was our Lord, the
true Word of God, Who, invisibly exposing each man’s error, is by Himself
bearing off all men from them all, so that while they who were worshipping
idols now trample upon them, those in repute for magic burn their books, and
the wise prefer to all studies the interpretation of the Gospels?
2. For whom they used to worship, them they are deserting, and Whom they used to mock as one crucified, Him they worship as Christ, confessing Him to be God. And they that are called gods among them are routed by the Sign of the Cross, while the Crucified Saviour is proclaimed in all the world as God and the Son of God. And the gods worshipped among the Greeks are falling into ill repute at their hands, as scandalous beings; while those who receive the teaching of Christ live a chaster life than they. 3. If, then, these and the like are human works, let him who will point out similar works on the part of men of former time, and so convince us. But if they prove to be, and are, not men’s works, but God’s, why are the unbelievers so irreligious as not to recognise the Master that wrought them? 4. For their case is as though a man, from the works of creation, failed to know God their Artificer. For if they knew His Godhead from His power over the universe, they would have known that the bodily works of Christ also are not human, but are the works of the Saviour of all, the Word of God. And did they thus know, “they would not,” as Paul said155 , “have crucified the Lord of glory.”
As, then, if a man should wish to see God, Who is
invisible by nature and not seen at all, he may know and apprehend Him from His
works: so let him who fails to see Christ with his understanding, at least
apprehend Him by the works of His body, and test whether they be human works or
God’s works. 2. And if they be human, let him scoff; but if they are not human,
but of God, let him recognise it, and not laugh at what is no matter for
scoffing; but rather let him marvel that by so ordinary a means things divine
have been manifested to us, and that by death immortality has reached to all,
and that by the Word becoming man, the universal Providence has been known, and
its Giver and Artificer the very Word of God. 3. For He was made man that we
might be made God156 ;
and He manifested Himself by a body that we might receive the idea of the
unseen Father; and He endured the insolence of men that we might inherit
immortality. For while He Himself was in no way injured, being impossible and
incorruptible and very Word and God, men who were suffering, and for whose
sakes He endured all this, He maintained and preserved in His own
impossibility. 4. And, in a word, the achievements of the Saviour, resulting
from His becoming man, are of such kind and number, that if one should wish to
enumerate them, he may be compared to men who gaze at the expanse of the sea
and wish to count its waves. For as one cannot take in the whole of the waves
with his eyes, for those which are coming on baffle the sense of him that
attempts it; so for him that would take in all the achievements of Christ in
the body, it is impossible to take in the whole, even by reckoning them up, as
those which go beyond his thought are more than those he thinks he has taken
in. 5. Better is it, then, not to aim at speaking of the whole, where one
cannot do justice even to a part, but, after mentioning one more, to leave the
whole for you to marvel at. For all alike are marvellous, and wherever a man
turns his glance, he may behold on that side the divinity of the Word, and be
struck with exceeding great awe.
This, then, after what we have so far said, it is right
for you to realize, and to take as the sum of what we have already stated, and
to marvel at exceedingly; namely, that since the Saviour has come among us,
idolatry not only has no longer increased, but what there was is diminishing
and gradually coming to an end : and not only does the wisdom of the Greeks no
longer advance, but what there is is now fading away : and demons, so far from
cheating any more by illusions and prophecies and magic arts, if they so much
as dare to make the attempt, are put to shame by the sign of the Cross. 2. And
to sum the matter up: behold how the Saviour’s doctrine is everywhere
increasing, while all idolatry and everything opposed to the faith of Christ is
daily dwindling, and losing power, and falling. And thus beholding, worship the
Saviour, “Who is above all” and mighty, even God the Word; and condemn those
who are being worsted and done away by Him. 3. For as, when the sun is come,
darkness no longer prevails, but if any be still left anywhere it is driven
away; so, now that the divine Appearing of the Word of God is come, the
darkness of the idols prevails no more, and all parts of the world in every
direction are illumined by His teaching. 4. And as, when a king is reigning in
some country without appearing but keeps at home in his own house, often some
disorderly persons, abusing his retirement, proclaim themselves; and each of
them, by assuming the character, imposes on the simple as king, and so men are
led astray by the name, hearing that there is a king, but not seeing him, if
for no other reason, because they cannot enter the house; but when the real
king comes forth and appears, then the disorderly impostors are exposed by his
presence, while men, seeing the real king, desert those who previously led them
astray: 5. in like manner, the evil spirits formerly used to deceive men,
investing themselves with God’s honour; but when the Word of God appeared in a
body, and made known to us His own Father, then at length the deceit of the
evil spirits is done away and stopped, while men, turning their eyes to the
true God, Word of the Father, are deserting the idols, and now coming to know
the true God. 6. Now this is a proof that Christ is God the Word, and the Power
of God. For whereas human things cease, and the Word of Christ abides, it is
clear to all eyes that what ceases is temporary, but that He Who abides is God,
and the true Son of God, His only-begotten Word.
Let this, then, Christ-loving man, be our offering to you,
just for a rudimentary sketch and outline, in a short compass, of the faith of
Christ and of His Divine appearing to usward. But you, taking occasion by this,
if you light upon the text of the Scriptures, by genuinely applying your mind
to them, will learn from them more completely and clearly the exact detail of
what we have said. 2. For they were spoken and written by God, through men who
spoke of God. But we impart of what we have learned from inspired teachers who
have been conversant with them, who have also become martyrs for the deity of
Christ, to your zeal for learning, in turn.
3. And you will also learn about His second glorious and truly divine appearing to us, when no longer in lowliness, but in His own glory,—no longer in humble guise, but in His own magnificence,—He is to come, no more to suffer, but thenceforth to render to all the fruit of His own Cross, that is, the resurrection and incorruption; and no longer to be judged, but to judge all, by what each has done in the body, whether good or evil; where there is laid up for the good the kingdom of heaven, but for them that have done evil everlasting fire and outer darkness. 4. For thus the Lord Himself also says: “Henceforth157 ye shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming on the clouds of heaven in the glory of the Father.” 5. And for this very reason there is also a word of the Saviour to prepare us for that day, in these words: “Be158 ye ready and watch, for He cometh at an hour ye know not.” For, according to the blessed Paul: “We159 must all stand before the judgment-seat of Christ. that each one may receive according as he hath done in the body, whether it be good or bad.”
But for the searching or the Scriptures and true knowledge
of them, an honourable life is needed, and a pure soul, and that virtue which
is according to Christ; so that the intellect guiding its path by it, may be
able to attain what it desires, and to comprehend it, in so far as it is
accessible to human nature to learn concerning the Word of God. 2. For without
a pure mind and a modelling of the life after the saints, a man could not
possibly comprehend the words of the saints. 3. For just as, if a man wished to
see the light of the sun, he would at any rate wipe and brighten his eye,
purifying himself in some sort like what he desires, so that the eye, thus
becoming light, may see the light of the sun; or as, if a man would see a city
or country, he at any rate comes to the place to see it;—thus he that would
comprehend the mind of those who speak of God must needs begin by washing and
cleansing his soul, by his manner of living, and approach the saints themselves
by imitating their works; so that, associated with them in the conduct of a
common life, he may understand also what has been revealed to them by God, and
thenceforth, as closely knit to them, may escape the peril of the sinners and
their fire at the day of judgment, and receive what is laid up for the saints
in the kingdom of heaven, which “Eye hath not seen160 , nor ear heard, neither have
entered into the heart of man,” whatsoever things are prepared for them that
live a virtuous life, and love the God and Father, in Christ Jesus our Lord:
through Whom and with Whom be to the Father Himself, with the Son Himself, in
the Holy Spirit, honour and might and glory for ever and ever. Amen.
1 See Contra Gentes, i. The word (Makarie) may be an adjective only, but its occurrence in both places seems decisive. The name was very common (Apol. c. Ar. passim). ‘Macarius’ was a Christian, as the present passage shews: he is presumed (c. Gent. i. 7) to have access to Scripture.
2 th" eusebeia". See 1 Tim. iii, 16, and note 1 on De Decr. 1.
3 Or, “been made in one way only.” In the next clause I formerly translated the difficult words w" epi swmato" eno" ‘as in the case of the universe;’ but although the rendering has commended itself to others I now reluctantly
4 ei" to einai.
5 Matt. xix. 4, &c.
6 John i. 3.
7 Ge. i. 1.
8 Herm. Mand. 1.
9 Heb. xi. 3.
10 c. Gent. xli. and Plato, Timoeus 29 E.
11 Ge. ii. 16, sq.
12 Cf.
Orat. ii. 54, note 4.
13 c. Gent. 3–5.
14 Eccles. vii. 29; Rom. i. 21, Rom. i. 22.
15 Ro. v. 14.
16 Wisd. vi. 18.
17 Ps. lxxxii. 6, sq.
18 Cf.
Concil. Araus. II. Can. 23. ‘Suam voluntatem homines faciunt, non Dei, quando
id agunt quod Deo displicet.’
19 Wisd. ii. 23, sq.
20 Rom. i. 26, sq.
21 Gen.
ii. 15.
22 Gal. iii. 19 (verbally only).
23 Cf. Anselm cur Deus Homo, II. 4, ‘Valde alienum est ab eo, ut ullam rationalem naturam penitus perire sinat.’
24 Literally “what is reasonable with respect to God,” i.e. what is involved in His attributes and in His relation to us, cf. Rom. iii. 26, cf. Anselm, ib. I. 12, who slightly narrows down the idea or Athan. ‘Si peccatum sic dimittitur impunitum, similiter erit apud Deum peccanti et non peccanti, quod Deo non convenit …. Inconvenientia autem iniustitia est.’
25 See previous note.
26 See previous note.
27 Acts xvii. 27.
28 Cf. vi. 3.
29 Cf. 43. 2.
30 Cf. Orat. iii. 33, note 5, also ib. 31, note 10.
31 Cf. Orat. iii. 33, note 5, also ib. 31, note 10.
32 The simile is inverted. Men are the ‘straw,’ death the ‘fire.’ cf. xliv. 7.
33 antiyucon.
34 Possibly suggested by the practice of the emperors. Constantinople was thus dignified a few years later (326). For this simile compare Sermo Major de Fide, c. 6.
35 Or, “to put an end to death.”
36 2 Cor. v. 14.
37 Heb. 2. 9, sq.
38 Heb.
2. 14, sq.
39 Cf.
Gal. vi. 17.
40 1 Co. 15. 21, sq.
41 1
Ti. vi. 15.
42 Cf. 13. 2.
43 Cf. Rom. 1. 25.
44 autwn may refer to the daimone", in which case compare c. Gent. 25. sub fin.
45 See
c. Gent. 25. 1, ta omoia toi" omoioi". Or the text may mean simply “as
their due.”
46 The Bened. text is corrected here on the ground (1)of ms. evidence, (2) of construction (for which see 6, 7, and c. Gent. 20. 3).
47 Cf. Luc. xix. 10.
48 See John iii. 3, John iii. 5.
49 1 Cor. i. 21.
50 Lit. “draws toward Himself.”
51 Lit. “infer.”
52 Lit. “draws toward Himself.”
53 Cf. 14. 2.
54 Eph. iii. 18, sq.
55 dia toutou,
perhaps, in both places—“by it,” viz. His body.
56 dia toutou,
perhaps, in both places—“by it,” viz. His body.
57 Cf. St. Aug. de Fid. et Symb. 10, Rufin. in Symb. Apost. 12. So also Tertull. adv. Marc. ‘Quodcunque induerit ipse dignum fecit.’
58 1 Pet. ii. 22.
59 Compare Orat. iii. 31, note 11.
60 John x. 37, sq.
61 Cf.
49. 2.
62 autozwh, see c. Gent. 40, 46, and Orat. iv. 2, note 4.
63 See
64 e.g. viii. 4; x. 5, &c. ‘It is quite a peculiarity of Ath. to repeat, and to apologise for doing so,’ (Newman in Orat. ii. 80 note 1).
65 epibasi", compare epibainein, 43. 4, &c.
66 epibasi", compare epibainein, 43. 4, &c.
67 Cf. 10. 4, above.
68 1 Cor. xv. 53, sqq.
69 Cf. Joh. x. 17, Joh. x. 18.
70 Cf. Matt. xxvii. 42.
71 i.e. when sustained by its union with Him.
72 Acts xxvi. 26.
73 Luke xxiv. 11.
74 i.e. suggested as endoxon (supra, 1); a reading par eautou has been suggested: (devised) “by Himself.”
75 Gal. iii. 13.
76 Deut, xxi. 23.
77 Eph. ii. 14.
78 John xii. 32.
79 Eph. ii. 2, and see the curious visions of Antony, Vit. Ant., 65, 66.
80 Heb. x. 20.
81 Cf. Lightfoot on Coloss. ii. 15, also the fragment of Letter 22, and Letter 60. 7.
82 Luc. x. 18.
83 Ps. xxiv. 7, [LXX.]
84 Literally ‘at an even’ [distance], as contrasted with (a) the same day (2, above), (b) the third day (en tritaiw diasthmati (6, below). en isw must therefore be equivalent in sense to deuteraiou. Possibly the literal sense is ‘[had the Resurrection taken place] at an equal interval between the Death and the [actual day of] the Resurrection.’
85 Cf. Ps. lv. 4, Ps. lxxxix. 47; Job. xviii. 14.
86 Cf. Acts. ii. 24.
87 Cf. above, 21. 2.
88 kata tou puro". kata appears to have the predicative force so common in Aristotle. The Bened, translation ‘the weakness of fire against the asbestos’ is based on a needless conjecture.
89 Heb. iv. 12.
90 Cf. Luc. iv. 34, and Marc. v. 7.
91 Matt. i. 23; Isa. vii. 14.
92 Num. xxiv. 5–17.
93 Isa. viii. 4.
94 Isa. xix. 1.
95 Hos. xi. 1.
96 Isa. liii. 3, sqq.
97 Or,
“exalted.”
98 thn uper autou dunamin. The Ben. version simplifies this difficult expression by ignoring the uper. Mr. E. N. Bennett has suggested to me that the true reading may be uperaulon for iper autou (aulo" supra 8. 1, uperaulw" in Philo). I would add the suggestion that autou stood after uperaulon, and that the similarity of the five letters in ms. caused the second word to be dropped out. ‘His’ exceeding immaterial power would be the resulting sense. (See Class. Review, 1890, No. iv. p. 182.)
99 Or,
“exalted.”
100 Deut xxviii. 66, see Orat ii. 16, note 1.
101 Jer. xi. 19.
102 Properly “let us destroy the tree with its bread” (i.e. fruit). The LXX, they either mistook the verb, or followed some wrong reading. Their rendering is followed by all the Latin versions. For a comment on the latter see Tertull. adv. Marc. iii. 19, iv. 40.
103 Ps. xxii. 16, sqq.
104 Isa.
xi. 10.
105 Or ‘only after he had grown great,’ i.e. to man’s estate.
106 Isa. viii. 4, where note LXX.
107 Cf. Letter 61. 4.
108 Cf. 35. 2, and 34. 3.
109 Isa. lxv. 1, Isa. lxv. 2; cf. Rom. x. 20, sq.
110 Isa.
xxxv. 3, sqq.
111 John ix. 32, sq.
112 Dan.
ix. 24, sq.
113 Lit.
“answer,” a misrendering of the Hebrew.
114 Gen. xlix. 10.
115 Matt. xi. 13 cf. Luc. xvi. 16.
116 Cf. Ps. cxviii. 27, and for the literal sense, Num. vi. 25.
117 Ps. cvii. 20.
118 Isa. lxiii. 9 (LXX.), and the note in the (Queen’s Printers’) ‘Variorum’ Bible.
119 Athan. here assumes, for the purpose of his argument, the principles of the Neo-platonist schools. They were influenced, in regard to the Logos, by Philo, but even on this subject the germ of their teaching may be traced in Plato, especially in the Timoeus, (See Drummond’s Philo, i. 65–88. Bigg’s Bamp. Lect. 14, 18, 248–253, and St. Aug. Confess. in ‘Nicene Fathers,’ Series 1, vol. 1, p. 107 and notes.)
120 Especially Plato, Tim. 30, &c.
121 epibebhkenai, cf. above, 20. 4, 6. The Union of God and Man in Christ is of course ‘hypostatic’ or personal, and thus (supra 17. 1), different in kind from the union of the Word with Creation. His argument is ad homines. It was not for thinkers who identified the Universe with God to take exception to the idea of Incarnation.
122 See Acts. xvii. 28.
123 epibainwn, see supra, note 3.
124 The superfluous pepoihkenai is ignored, being untranslateable as the text stands. For a less simple conjecture, see the Bened. note.
125 This thought is beautifully expressed by Keble :—
‘All true, all faultless, all in tune, Creation’s wondrous choir
Opened in mystic unison, to last till time expire.
And still it lasts: by day and night with one consenting voice
All hymn Thy glory Lord, aright, all worship and rejoice:
Man only mars the sweet accord” ….
(‘Christian Year,’ Fourth
Sunday after Trinity.)
126 Cf.
41. 5, note 3.
127 Cf. Orig. c. Cels. vi. 64, where there is the same contrast between metecein and metecesqai.
128 Ath. paraphrases loosely Plat. Politic. 273 D. See Jowett’s Plato (ed. 2) vol. iv. pp. 515, 553.
129 Lit. “sate down”, as four lines above.
130 With this discussion compare that upon ‘repentance’ above 7. (esp. 7. 4).
131 Restoration by a mere fiat would have shewn God’s power, the Incarnation shews His Love. See Orat. i. 52, note 1, ii. 68, note 1.
132 Cf. Orat. i. 56, note 5, 65, note 3.
133 See above 28. 3. He appears not to have seen the substance.
134 Isa.
135 See
136 Col. ii. 15.
137 The Incarnation completes the circle of God’s self-witness and of man’s responsibility.
138 Cf. notes on c. Gent. 10, and 12. 2.
139 On Lect. 248, note 1.
140 On substance in Barker’s Aryan Civilisation).
141 On stanza xix.
142 i.e. that of Trophonius.
143 Patara.
144 Ammon.
145 See many ancient sanctuaries, but principally in Samothrace and Lemnos.
146 Cf. extracts from early Fathers, collected by Hurter in ‘Opuscula SS. Patrum Selecta,’ vol 1, appendix.
147 For this opinion, see note 1 on c. Gent. 12.
148 See
149 In Plato’s ideal Republic, the notion of any direct influence of the highest ideals upon the masses is quite absent. Their happiness is to be in passive obedience to the few whom those ideals inspire. (Contrast Isa. liv. 13, Jer. xxxi. 34.)
150 Cf. Hist. Arian. 25, Apol. Const. 33.
151 e.g. Iamblichus, &c., cf. Introd. to c. Gent.
152 Cf.
Thucy. i. 5 6: ‘pasa gar h {Ella" esidhroforei,’ &c.
153 Isa. ii. 4.
154 St. Augustine, Civ. D. IV. xvi. commenting on the fact that the temple of ‘Repose’ (Quies) at Rome was not within the city walls, suggests ‘qui illam turbam colere perseveraret …doemoniorum, cure Quietem hahere non posse.’
155 1 Cor. ii. 8.
156 qeopoihqwmen. See Orat. ii. 70, note 1, and many other passages in those Discourses, as well as Letters 60. 4, 61 2. (Eucharistic reference), de Synodis 51, note 7. (Compare also Iren. IV. xxxviii. 4, ‘non ab initio dii facti sumus, sed primo quidem homines, tunc demum dii,’ cf. ib. praef. 4. fin. also V. ix. 2, ‘sublevat in vitam Dei.’ Origen Cels. iii. 28 fin. touches the same thought, but Ath. is here in closer affinity to the idea of Irenaeus than to that of Origen.) The New Test. reference is 2 Pet. i. 4, rather than Heb. ii. 9 sqq; the Old Test., Ps. lxxxii. 6, which seems to underlie Orat. iii. 25 (note 5). In spite of the last mentioned passage, ‘God’ is far preferable as a rendering, in most places, to ‘gods,’ which has heathenish associations. To us (1 Cor. viii. 6) there are no such things as ‘gods.’ (The best summary of patristic teaching on this subject is given by Harnack Dg. ii. p. 46 note.)
157 Matt. xxvi. 64.
158 Cf. Matt. xxiv 42; Marc. xiii. 35.
159 2 Cor. v. 10; cf Rom. xiv. 10.
160 1 Cor. ii. 9.