489 Mark xi. 27-33; Luke xix. 47-xx. 8.
490 [The order of occurrences during this day of public controversy in the temple presents few difficulties. It was probably the Tuesday of Passion Week. The day of the month is in dispute because of the still mooted question, whether our Lord ate the last passover at the regular time or one day earlier.-R.]
492 Mark xii. 1-11; Luke xx. 9-18.
495 Ps. cxviii. 26; Matt. xxi. 9.
496 Keeping quia veritas est, for which the reading qui veritas est = "who is the truth," also occurs.
501 That is to say, the aiunt illi is the rendering for le/gousin au0tw=. [This reading of the Greek text is abundantly attested.-R.]
506 Mark xii. 12; Luke xx. 19.
508 Mark xii. 13-27; Luke xx. 20-40.
510 Another but evidently faulty reading is sometimes found here,-namely, Lucas autem hoc tacet et in fine Marcus, etc. = whereas Luke says nothing about that, and Mark tells us, etc.
511 Minorabitur. Ecclus. xix. 4.
526 Matt. xxiv. 1, 2. According to Migne, certain codices add here the clause, "when the disciples were asking the Lord privately what was the sign of His coming."
529 [Many harmonists insert at this point the events narrated in John xii. 20-50. Augustine does not express an opinion in regard to this passage.-R.]
530 Matt. xxiv. 3-xxv. 46; Mark xiii. 4-37; Luke xxi. 7-36.
534 Mark xiii. 14. [The Greek text of Mark, according to the best authorities, does not contain the phrase "spoken of by Daniel the prophet." Augustine also omits the clause, but the Edinburgh edition inserts it, following the Authorized Version. It has therefore been stricken out in this edition.-R.]
539 Matt. xxvi. 1, 2 [It cannot be determined with certainty how much time is to be included in the phrase "after two days." Moreover, the difficulty in regard to the time of the Last Supper affects this question, to some extent at least.-R.]
540 Mark xiv. 1; Luke xxii. 1.
541 John xi. 55, xii. 1, xiii. 1.