⁷¹⁹ The Arabic text has deriding (cf. §51, 37). Either with is accidentally omitted. or, more probably, we should correct the spelling to shaking (cf. Syriac versions).

129 36 Mt. 27, 40a.; Mk. 15, 29.

130 37 Mt. 27, 40c.; Mt. 27, 41.

131 38 Mt. 27, 42a.

132 39 Lk. 23, 35c.; Mt. 27, 42c.

⁷²⁰ Verse 37 or Mt.

134 40 Mt. 27, 43.

135 41 Lk. 23, 36.

136 42 Lk. 23, 37.

137 43 Mt. 27, 44.

⁷²¹ Borg. MS. has boys (an easy clerical error).

139 44 Lk. 23, 39.

140 45 Lk. 23, 40.

141 46 Lk. 23, 41.

⁷²² Our deed might be read we have done, and perhaps our translator's style would justify our writing as for to.

143 47 Lk. 23, 42.

144 48 Lk. 23, 43.

⁷²³ Borg. MS. has Verily, verily.

146 49 Jo. 19, 25.

⁷²⁴ A single word in Arabic.

⁷²⁵ Vat. MS. has and Mary.

149 50 Jo. 19, 26.

150 51 Jo. 19, 27.

151 52 Mt. 27, 45a.; Lk. 23, 44b.

⁷²⁶ Lit six hours and nine hours respectively.

⁷²⁷ Lit six hours and nine hours respectively.

154 53 Lk. 23, 45a.; Mk. 15, 34.

⁷²⁸ In Vat. MS. the second word is like the first. The syllable Ya doubtless is the Arabic interjection 0!

⁷²⁹ The Borg. MS. omits from which to me.

157 54 Mt. 27, 47.

⁷³⁰ Borg. MS. omits when they, and has and said.

159 1 Jo. 19, 28.

160 2 Jo. 19, 29a.; Mt. 27, 48.

161 3 Mk. 15, 36b.

⁷³¹ cf. §12, 13, note.

163 4 Jo. 19, 30a.

164 5 Mt. 27, 49.; Lk. 23, 34.

⁷³² Or, Let us.

166 6 Lk. 23, 46a.

167 7 Jo. 19, 30b.

⁷³³ Lit. lay down.

169 8 Mt. 27, 51.

⁷³⁴ cf. Syriac versions and Ibn-at-Tayyib's Commentary. Vat. MS. omits the face of.

171 9 Mt. 27, 52.

172 10 Mt. 27, 53.

173 11 Mt. 27, 54.

⁷³⁵ This sentence is a good example of word-for-word translation of the Peshitta.

175 12 Lk. 23, 47b.; Mt. 27, 54b.

176 13 Lk. 23, 48.

177 14 Jo. 19, 31.

⁷³⁶ The word is probably plural

179 15 Jo. 19, 32.

180 16 Jo. 19, 33.

181 17 Jo. 19, 34.

⁷³⁷ Lit. ripped.

183 18 Jo. 19, 35.

184 19 Jo. 19, 36.

185 20 Jo. 19, 37.

⁷³⁸ Lit. ripped.

187 21 Lk. 23, 49a.; Mk. 15, 41b.

188 22 Mt. 27, 56a.; Mk. 15, 40b.

189 23 Mt. 27, 56c.; Mk. 15,40c,41c.; Lk. 23, 49b.

190 24 Mk. 15, 42.

⁷³⁹ Mt. 27, 57.

⁷⁴⁰ Borg. MS. omits.

⁷⁴¹ Lk. 23, 51b.

⁷⁴² Syriac versions.

195 25 Lk. 23, 50.; Jo. 19, 38b.

⁷⁴³ Lit. the.

197 26 Lk. 23, 51a.

198 27 Lk. 23, 51c.; Mk. 15, 43b.

199 28 Mk. 15, 44.

200 29 Mk. 15, 45a.

201 30 Mt. 27, 58b.; Mk. 15, 46a.

202 31 Jo. 19, 38d.; Jo. 19, 39.

⁷⁴⁴ The preparation used in embalming.

204 32 Jo. 19, 40.

205 33 Jo. 19, 41.

⁷⁴⁵ Mk. 15, 46. Lit. a stone.

207 34 Jo. 19, 42.

208 35 Mt. 27, 60b.

⁷⁴⁶ On the plural, which is to be found also in Ibn-at-Tayyib's Commentary, see §38, 43, note (end). The word chosen might be simply a clerical error for an original Arabic rolled.

⁷⁴⁷ Lit. cast (cf. Sinaitic).

211 36 Mk. 15, 47a.

⁷⁴⁸ Dual. The clause (from came) is found verbatim in Sin. and Cur. at Lk. 23, 55. Here, after the word Luke of the reference, at the end of leaf 117 of Vat. MS., is a note by a later hand: "Here a leaf is wanting." This second and lastlacuna extends from §52, 37, to §53, 4.

213 37 Lk. 23, 55b.

⁷⁴⁹ Mt. 27, 61b.

215 38 Lk. 23, 56a.; Mk. 16, 1b.

⁷⁵⁰ cf. Sinaitic.

⁷⁵¹ The two Arabic words are practically synonymous (cf. Lk. 23, 56, Pesh.).

⁷⁵² Lk. 23, 56.

219 39 Lk. 23, 56c.